Marcin Kapuściński, Author at Transition Technologies MS S.A.

TOP 10 AEM partners in 2025

Ranking the Best AEM Companies: Meet the Top 10 Partners for Your 2025 Projects The market for Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) implementations continues to expand as brands seek unified content management and customer‑centric digital experiences. Organisations that partner with AEM implementation partners gain access to deep technical expertise, accelerators and strategic guidance that help them move faster than competitors. Below are ten leading AEM development companies in 2025, ranked by market presence, breadth of services and overall experience. TTMS tops the list of the best Adobe Experience Manager Consulting Partners thanks to its comprehensive services, experienced consultants and innovative use of AI for content delivery. 1. Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) TTMS is a Bronze Adobe Solution Partner with one of the largest AEM competence centres in Poland and top AEM experts. The company’s philosophy emphasises personalisation and customer‑centric design: it provides end‑to‑end services covering architecture, development, maintenance and performance optimisation, and its 90‑plus consultants ensure deep expertise across all AEM modules. TTMS integrates AEM with marketing automation platforms such as Marketo, Adobe Campaign and Analytics, as well as Salesforce and customer identity systems, enabling seamless omnichannel experiences. The firm also leverages generative AI to automate tagging, translation and metadata generation, offers AI‑powered search and chatbots, and uses accelerators to reduce time‑to‑market, giving clients significant competitive advantage. Beyond core implementation, TTMS specialises in product catalogue and PIM integration. Its AEM development teams integrate existing product data into AEM’s DAM and authoring tools to eliminate manual entry errors and ensure consistent product information across channels. They also build secure customer portals on AEM that provide personalised experiences and HIPAA‑compliant document management. For organisations moving to AEM as a Cloud Service, TTMS handles performance testing, environment set‑up, integrated marketing workflows and training. Consulting services include platform audits, tailored onboarding, optimisation of legacy implementations, custom integrations and training for internal teams. Thanks to this comprehensive offering, TTMS stands out as a trusted AEM implementation partner that delivers strategic advice and innovative solutions. TTMS: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 233.7 million Number of employees: 800+ Website: https://ttms.com/aem/ Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: AEM consulting & development, AI integration, PIM & product catalogue integration, customer portals, cloud migration, marketing automation integration, training and support 2. Vaimo Headquartered in Stockholm, Vaimo is a global commerce solution provider known for implementing AEM alongside Magento. The company’s strength lies in combining strategy, design and technology to build unified digital commerce platforms. Vaimo integrates AEM with e‑commerce systems and marketing automation tools, enabling brands to manage content and product data across multiple channels. Its expertise in user experience, technical architecture and performance optimisation positions Vaimo as a reliable AEM implementation partner for retailers seeking personalised shopping experiences. Vaimo: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 500+ Website: www.vaimo.com Headquarters: Stockholm, Sweden Main services / focus: AEM & Magento integration, digital commerce platforms, design & strategy, omnichannel experiences 3. Appnovation Appnovation is a full‑service digital consultancy with offices in North America, Europe and Asia. The firm combines digital strategy, experience design and technology to deliver enterprise‑grade AEM solutions. Appnovation’s multidisciplinary teams develop multi‑channel content architectures, integrate analytics and marketing automation tools, and provide managed services to optimise clients’ AEM platforms. Its global presence and user‑centric design approach make Appnovation a popular AEM development company for organisations pursuing large‑scale digital transformation. Appnovation: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 600+ Website: www.appnovation.com Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada Main services / focus: AEM implementation, user‑experience design, digital strategy, cloud‑native development, managed services 4. Magneto IT Solutions Magneto IT Solutions specialises in building e‑commerce platforms and digital experiences for retail brands. It leverages Adobe Experience Manager to create scalable, content‑driven websites and integrates AEM with Magento, Shopify and other commerce platforms. The company’s strong focus on design and conversion optimisation helps clients deliver seamless shopping experiences. Magneto’s ability to customise AEM for specific retail verticals positions it among the top AEM implementation partners for online stores. Magneto IT Solutions: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 200+ Website: www.magnetoitsolutions.com Headquarters: Ahmedabad, India Main services / focus: AEM development for retail, e‑commerce integration, UX/UI design, digital marketing 5. Akeneo Akeneo is recognised for its product information management (PIM) platform and its synergy with AEM. The company enables brands to centralise and enrich product data, then syndicate it to AEM to ensure consistency across digital channels. By integrating AEM with its PIM tool, Akeneo helps organisations streamline product catalogue management, reduce manual entry and improve data accuracy. This focus on product data integrity makes Akeneo an important partner for companies using AEM in commerce and manufacturing. Akeneo: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 400+ Website: www.akeneo.com Headquarters: Nantes, France Main services / focus: Product information management, AEM & PIM integration, digital commerce solutions 6. Codal Codal is a design‑driven digital agency that combines user experience research with robust engineering. The firm adopts a user‑centric approach to AEM implementations, ensuring that information architecture, component design and content workflows meet both customer and business needs. Codal’s teams also integrate data analytics and marketing automation platforms with AEM, enabling clients to make informed decisions and deliver personalised experiences. This design‑first ethos makes Codal a top choice for brands looking to align aesthetics and technology. Codal: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 250+ Website: www.codal.com Headquarters: Chicago, USA Main services / focus: AEM implementation, UX/UI design, data analytics, integration services 7. Synecore Synecore is a UK‑based digital marketing agency that blends inbound marketing strategies with AEM’s powerful content management capabilities. It helps clients craft inbound campaigns, develop content strategies and integrate marketing automation tools with AEM. Synecore’s team ensures that content, design and technical implementations support lead generation and customer engagement. Its expertise in inbound marketing and content strategy positions Synecore as a valuable AEM development company for organisations seeking to combine marketing and technology. Synecore: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 50+ Website: www.synecore.co.uk Headquarters: London, UK Main services / focus: Inbound marketing, content strategy, AEM implementation, marketing automation integration 8. Mageworx Mageworx is best known for its Magento extensions, but the company also offers AEM integration services for e‑commerce sites. By connecting AEM with Magento and other e‑commerce platforms, Mageworx enables brands to manage product information and content in one environment. The company develops custom modules, optimises website performance and provides SEO and analytics integration to drive online sales. For merchants looking to leverage AEM within a Magento ecosystem, Mageworx is a solid partner. Mageworx: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 100+ Website: www.mageworx.com Headquarters: Minneapolis, USA Main services / focus: Magento extensions, AEM integration, performance optimisation, SEO & analytics 9. Spargo Spargo is a Polish digital transformation firm focusing on commerce, content and marketing technologies. It uses AEM to deliver integrated digital experiences for clients in retail, finance and media. Spargo combines product information management, marketing automation and e‑commerce integrations to help brands operate efficiently across multiple channels. With its cross‑platform expertise and agile methodology, Spargo stands out among regional AEM implementation partners. Spargo: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 100+ Website: www.spargo.pl Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Digital commerce solutions, AEM development, PIM integration, marketing automation 10. Divante Divante is an e‑commerce software house and innovation partner based in Poland. It has strong expertise in Magento, Pimcore and AEM, and builds headless commerce architectures that allow clients to deliver content across multiple devices and channels. Divante’s teams focus on open‑source technologies, API‑first approaches and custom integrations, enabling rapid experimentation and scalability. The company’s community‑driven culture and technical depth make it a trusted partner for enterprises looking to modernise their digital commerce stack. Divante: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Undisclosed Number of employees: 300+ Website: www.divante.com Headquarters: Wrocław, Poland Main services / focus: Headless commerce, AEM development, open‑source platforms, custom integrations Our AEM Case Studies: Proven Expertise in Action At TTMS, we believe that real results speak louder than promises. Below you will find selected case studies that illustrate how our team successfully delivers AEM consulting, migrations, integrations, and AI-driven optimizations for global clients across various industries Migrating to Adobe EDS – We successfully migrated a complex ecosystem into Adobe EDS, ensuring seamless data flow and robust scalability. The project minimized downtime and prepared the client for future growth. Adobe Analytics Integration with AEM – TTMS integrated Adobe Analytics with AEM to deliver actionable insights for marketing and content teams. This improved customer experience tracking and enabled data-driven decision-making. Integration of PingOne and Adobe AEM – We implemented secure identity management by integrating PingOne with AEM. The solution strengthened authentication and improved user experience across digital platforms. AI SEO Meta Optimization – By applying AI-driven SEO optimization in AEM, we boosted the client’s search visibility and organic traffic. The approach delivered measurable improvements in engagement and rankings. AEM Cloud Migration for a Watch Manufacturer – TTMS migrated a luxury watch brand’s digital ecosystem into AEM Cloud. The move improved performance, reduced costs, and enabled long-term scalability. Migration from Adobe LiveCycle to AEM Forms – We replaced legacy Adobe LiveCycle with modern AEM Forms, improving usability and efficiency. This allowed the client to streamline processes and reduce operational risks. Headless CMS Architecture for Multi-App Delivery – TTMS designed a headless CMS approach for seamless content delivery across multiple apps. The solution increased flexibility and accelerated time-to-market. Pharma Design System & Template Unification – We developed a unified design system for a global pharma leader. It improved brand consistency and reduced development costs across international teams. Accelerating Adobe Delivery through Expert Intervention – Our experts accelerated stalled Adobe projects, delivering results faster and more efficiently. The intervention saved resources and increased project success rates. Comprehensive Digital Audit for Strategic Clarity – TTMS conducted an in-depth digital audit that revealed key optimization areas. The client gained actionable insights and a roadmap for long-term success. Expert-Guided Content Migration – We supported a smooth transition to a new platform through structured content migration. This minimized risks and ensured business continuity during change. Global Patient Portal Improvement – TTMS enhanced a global medical portal by simplifying medical terminology for patients. The upgrade improved accessibility, patient satisfaction, and global adoption. If you want to learn how we can bring the same success to your AEM projects, our team is ready to help. Get in touch with TTMS today and let’s discuss how we can accelerate your digital transformation journey together. What makes a good AEM implementation partner in 2025? A good AEM implementation partner in 2025 is not only a company with certified Adobe Experience Manager expertise, but also one that can combine consulting, cloud migration, integration, and AI-driven solutions. The best partners deliver both technical precision and business alignment, ensuring that the implementation supports digital transformation goals. What really distinguishes the top firms today is their ability to integrate AEM with analytics, identity management, and personalization engines. This creates a scalable, secure, and customer-focused digital platform that drives measurable business value. How do I compare different AEM development companies? How to compare the best Adobe AEM implementation companies? When comparing AEM development companies, it is essential to look beyond price and consider factors such as their proven track record, the number of certified AEM developers, and the industries they serve. A reliable partner will provide transparency about previous projects, case studies, and long-term support models. It is also worth checking if the company is experienced in AEM Cloud Services, as many enterprises are migrating away from on-premises solutions. Finally, cultural fit and communication style play a huge role in successful collaborations, especially for global organizations. Is it worth choosing a local AEM consulting partner over a global provider? The decision between a local and a global AEM consulting partner depends on your organization’s priorities. A local partner may offer closer cultural alignment, time zone convenience, and faster on-site support. On the other hand, global providers often bring broader expertise, larger teams, and experience with complex multinational implementations. Many businesses in 2025 follow a hybrid approach, where they choose a mid-sized international AEM company that combines the flexibility of local service with the scalability of a global player. How much does it cost to implement AEM with a professional partner? The cost of implementing Adobe Experience Manager with a professional partner varies significantly depending on the project’s scale, complexity, and integrations required. For smaller projects, costs may start from tens of thousands of euros, while large-scale enterprise implementations can easily exceed several hundred thousand euros. What matters most is the return on investment – a skilled AEM partner will optimize content workflows, personalization, and data-driven marketing, generating long-term business value that outweighs the initial spend. Choosing the right partner ensures predictable timelines and reduced risk of costly delays. What are the latest trends in AEM implementations in 2025? In 2025, the hottest trends in AEM implementations revolve around AI integration, headless CMS architectures, and cloud-native deployments. Companies increasingly expect their AEM platforms to be fully compatible with AI-powered personalization, predictive analytics, and automated SEO optimization. Headless CMS setups are gaining momentum because they allow content to be delivered seamlessly across web, mobile, and IoT applications. At the same time, more organizations are moving to AEM Cloud Services, reducing infrastructure overhead while ensuring continuous updates and scalability. These trends highlight the need for AEM implementation partners who can innovate while maintaining enterprise-grade stability.

Read

Microsoft’s In-House AI Move: MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 Signal a Shift from OpenAI

Microsoft’s In-House AI Move: MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 Signal a Shift from OpenAI August 2025 – Microsoft has unveiled two internally developed AI models – MAI-1 (a new large language model) and MAI-Voice-1 (a speech generation model) – marking a strategic pivot toward technological independence from OpenAI. After years of leaning on OpenAI’s models (and investing around $13 billion in that partnership since 2019), Microsoft’s AI division is now striking out on its own with homegrown AI capabilities. This move signals that despite its deep ties to OpenAI, Microsoft is positioning itself to have more direct control over the AI technology powering its products – a development with big implications for the industry. A Strategic Pivot Away from OpenAI Microsoft’s announcement of MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 – made in late August 2025 – is widely seen as a bid for greater self-reliance in AI. Industry observers note that this “proprietary” turn represents a pivot away from dependence on OpenAI. For years, OpenAI’s GPT-series models (like GPT-4) have been the brains behind many Microsoft products (from Azure OpenAI services to GitHub Copilot and Bing’s chat). However, tensions have emerged in the collaboration. OpenAI has grown into a more independent (and highly valued) entity, and Microsoft reportedly “openly criticized” OpenAI’s GPT-4 as “too expensive and slow” for certain consumer needs. Microsoft even quietly began testing other AI models for its Copilot services, signaling concern about over-reliance on a single partner. In early 2024, Microsoft hired Mustafa Suleyman (co-founder of DeepMind and former Inflection AI CEO) to lead a new internal AI team – a clear sign it intended to develop its own models. Suleyman has since emphasized “optionality” in Microsoft’s AI strategy: the company will use the best models available – whether from OpenAI, open-source, or its own lab – routing tasks to whichever model is most capable. The launch of MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 puts substance behind that strategy. It gives Microsoft a viable in-house alternative to OpenAI’s tech, even as the two remain partners. In fact, Microsoft’s AI leadership describes these models as augmenting (not immediately replacing) OpenAI’s – for now. But the long-term trajectory is evident: Microsoft is preparing for a post-OpenAI future in which it isn’t beholden to an external supplier for core AI innovations. As one Computerworld analysis put it, Microsoft didn’t hire a visionary AI team “simply to augment someone else’s product” – it’s laying groundwork to eventually have its own AI foundation. Meet MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1: Microsoft’s New AI Models MAI-Voice-1 is Microsoft’s first high-performance speech generation model. The company says it can generate a full minute of natural-sounding audio in under one second on a single GPU, making it “one of the most efficient speech systems” available. In practical terms, MAI-Voice-1 gives Microsoft a fast, expressive text-to-speech engine under its own roof. It’s already powering user-facing features: for example, the new Copilot Daily service has an AI news host that reads top stories to users in a natural voice, and a Copilot Podcasts feature can create on-the-fly podcast dialogues from text prompts – both driven by MAI-Voice-1’s capabilities. Microsoft touts the model’s high fidelity and expressiveness across single- and multi-speaker scenarios. In an era where voice interfaces are rising, Microsoft clearly views this as strategic tech (the company even said “voice is the interface of the future” for AI companions). Notably, OpenAI’s own foray into audio has been Whisper, a model for speech-to-text transcription – but OpenAI hasn’t productized a comparable text-to-speech model. With MAI-Voice-1, Microsoft is filling that gap by offering AI that can speak to users with human-like intonation and speed, without relying on a third-party engine. MAI-1 (Preview) is Microsoft’s new large language model (LLM) for text, and it represents the company’s first internally trained foundation model. Under the hood, MAI-1 uses a mixture-of-experts architecture and was trained (and post-trained) on roughly 15,000 NVIDIA H100 GPUs. (For context, that is a substantial computing effort, though still more modest than the 100,000+ GPU clusters reportedly used to train some rival frontier models.) The model is designed to excel at instruction-following and helpful responses to everyday queries – essentially, the kind of general-purpose assistant tasks that GPT-4 and similar models handle. Microsoft has begun publicly testing MAI-1 in the wild: it was released as MAI-1-preview on LMArena, a community benchmarking platform where AI models can be compared head-to-head by users. This allows Microsoft to transparently gauge MAI-1’s performance against other AI models (competitors and open models alike) and iterate quickly. According to Microsoft, MAI-1 is already showing “a glimpse of future offerings inside Copilot” – and the company is rolling it out selectively into Copilot (Microsoft’s AI assistant suite across Windows, Office, and more) for tasks like text generation. In coming weeks, certain Copilot features will start using MAI-1 for handling user queries, with Microsoft collecting feedback to improve the model. In short, MAI-1 is not yet replacing OpenAI’s GPT-4 within Microsoft’s products, but it’s on a path to eventually play a major role. It gives Microsoft the ability to tailor and optimize an LLM specifically for its ecosystem of “Copilot” assistants. How do these models stack up against OpenAI’s? In terms of capabilities, OpenAI’s GPT-4 (and the newly released GPT-5) still set the bar in many domains, from advanced reasoning to code generation. Microsoft’s MAI-1 is a first-generation effort by comparison, and Microsoft itself acknowledges it is taking an “off-frontier” approach – aiming to be a close second rather than the absolute cutting edge. “It’s cheaper to give a specific answer once you’ve waited for the frontier to go first… that’s our strategy, to play a very tight second,” Suleyman said of Microsoft’s model efforts. The architecture choices also differ: OpenAI has not disclosed GPT-4’s architecture, but it is believed to be a giant transformer model utilizing massive compute resources. Microsoft’s MAI-1 explicitly uses a mixture-of-experts design, which can be more compute-efficient by activating different “experts” for different queries. This design, plus the somewhat smaller training footprint, suggests Microsoft may be aiming for a more efficient, cost-effective model – even if it’s not (yet) the absolute strongest model on the market. Indeed, one motivation for MAI-1 was likely cost/control: Microsoft found that using GPT-4 at scale was expensive and sometimes slow, impeding consumer-facing uses. By owning a model, Microsoft can optimize it for latency and cost on its own infrastructure. On the voice side, OpenAI’s Whisper model handles speech recognition (transcribing audio to text), whereas Microsoft’s MAI-Voice-1 is all about speech generation (producing spoken audio from text). This means Microsoft now has an in-house solution for giving its AI a “voice” – an area where it previously relied on third-party text-to-speech services or less flexible solutions. MAI-Voice-1’s standout feature is its speed and efficiency (near real-time audio generation), which is crucial for interactive voice assistants or reading long content aloud. The quality is described as high fidelity and expressive, aiming to surpass the often monotone or robotic outputs of older-generation TTS systems. In essence, Microsoft is assembling its own full-stack AI toolkit: MAI-1 for text intelligence, and MAI-Voice-1 for spoken interaction. These will inevitably be compared to OpenAI’s GPT-4 (text) and the various voice AI offerings in the market – but Microsoft now has the advantage of deeply integrating these models into its products and tuning them as it sees fit. Implications for Control, Data, and Compliance Beyond technical specs, Microsoft’s in-house AI push is about control – over the technology’s evolution, data, and alignment with company goals. By developing its own models, Microsoft gains a level of ownership that was impossible when it solely depended on OpenAI’s API. As one industry briefing noted, “Owning the model means owning the data pipeline, compliance approach, and product roadmap.” In other words, Microsoft can now decide how and where data flows in the AI system, set its own rules for governance and regulatory compliance, and evolve the AI functionality according to its own product timeline, not someone else’s. This has several tangible implications: Data governance and privacy: With an in-house model, sensitive user data can be processed within Microsoft’s own cloud boundaries, rather than being sent to an external provider. Enterprises using Microsoft’s AI services may take comfort that their data is handled under Microsoft’s stringent enterprise agreements, without third-party exposure. Microsoft can also more easily audit and document how data is used to train or prompt the model, aiding compliance with data protection regulations. This is especially relevant as new AI laws (like the EU’s AI Act) demand transparency and risk controls – having the AI “in-house” could simplify compliance reporting since Microsoft has end-to-end visibility into the model’s operation. Product customization and differentiation: Microsoft’s products can now get bespoke AI enhancements that a generic OpenAI model might not offer. Because Microsoft controls MAI-1’s training and tuning, it can infuse the model with proprietary knowledge (for example, training on Windows user support data to make a better helpdesk assistant) or optimize it for specific scenarios that matter to its customers. The Copilot suite can evolve with features that leverage unique model capabilities Microsoft builds (for instance, deeper integration with Microsoft 365 data or fine-tuned industry versions of the model for enterprise customers). This flexibility in shaping the roadmap is a competitive differentiator – Microsoft isn’t limited by OpenAI’s release schedule or feature set. As Launch Consulting emphasized to enterprise leaders, relying on off-the-shelf AI means your capabilities are roughly the same as your competitors’; owning the model opens the door to unique features and faster iterations. Compliance and risk management: By controlling the AI models, Microsoft can more directly enforce compliance with ethical AI guidelines and industry regulations. It can build in whatever content filters or guardrails it deems necessary (and adjust them promptly as laws change or issues arise), rather than being subject to a third party’s policies. For enterprises in regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, government), this control is vital – they need to ensure AI systems comply with sector-specific rules. Microsoft’s move could eventually allow it to offer versions of its AI that are certified for compliance, since it has full oversight. Moreover, any concerns about how AI decisions are made (transparency, bias mitigation, etc.) can be addressed by Microsoft’s own AI safety teams, potentially in a more customized way than OpenAI’s one-size-fits-all approach. In short, Microsoft owning the AI stack could translate to greater trust and reliability for enterprise customers who must answer to regulators and risk officers. It’s worth noting that Microsoft is initially applying MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 in consumer-facing contexts (Windows, Office 365 Copilot for end-users) and not immediately replacing the AI inside enterprise products. Suleyman himself commented that the first goal was to make something that works extremely well for consumers – leveraging Microsoft’s rich consumer telemetry and data – essentially using the broad consumer usage to train and refine the models. However, the implications for enterprise clients are on the horizon. We can expect that as these models mature, Microsoft will integrate them into its Azure AI offerings and enterprise Copilot products, offering clients the option of Microsoft’s “first-party” models in addition to OpenAI’s. For enterprise decision-makers, Microsoft’s pivot sends a clear message: AI is becoming core intellectual property, and owning or selectively controlling that IP can confer advantages in data governance, customization, and compliance that might be hard to achieve with third-party AI alone. Build Your Own or Buy? Lessons for Businesses Microsoft’s bold move raises a key question for other companies: Should you develop your own AI models, or continue relying on foundation models from providers like OpenAI or Anthropic? The answer will differ for each organization, but Microsoft’s experience offers some valuable considerations for any business crafting its AI strategy: Strategic control vs. dependence: Microsoft’s case illustrates the risk of over-dependence on an external AI provider. Despite a close partnership, Microsoft and OpenAI had diverging interests (even reportedly clashing over what Microsoft gets out of its big investment). If an AI capability is mission-critical to your business or product, relying solely on an outside vendor means your fate is tied to their decisions, pricing, and roadmap changes. Building your own model (or acquiring the talent to) gives you strategic independence. You can prioritize the features and values important to you without negotiating with a third party. However, it also means shouldering all the responsibility for keeping that model state-of-the-art. Resources and expertise required: On the flip side, few companies have the deep pockets and AI research muscle that Microsoft does. Training cutting-edge models is extremely expensive – Microsoft’s MAI-1 used 15,000 high-end GPUs just for its preview model, and the leading frontier models use even larger compute budgets. Beyond hardware, you need scarce AI research talent and large-scale data to train a competitive model. For most enterprises, it’s simply not feasible to replicate what OpenAI, Google, or Microsoft are doing at the very high end. If you don’t have the scale to invest in tens of millions (or more likely, hundreds of millions) of dollars in AI R&D, leveraging a pre-built foundation model might yield a far better ROI. Essentially, build if AI is a core differentiator you can substantially improve – but buy if AI is a means to an end and others can provide it more cheaply. Privacy, security, and compliance needs: A major driver for some companies to consider “rolling their own” AI is data sensitivity and compliance. If you operate in a field with strict data governance (say, patient health data, or confidential financial info), sending data to a third-party AI API – even with promises of privacy – might be a non-starter. An in-house model that you can deploy in a secure environment (or at least a model from a vendor willing to isolate your data) could be worth the investment. Microsoft’s move shows an example of prioritizing data control: by handling AI internally, they keep the whole data pipeline under their policies. Other firms, too, may decide that owning the model (or using an open-source model locally) is the safer path for compliance. That said, many AI providers are addressing this by offering on-premises or dedicated instances – so explore those options as well. Need for customization and differentiation: If the available off-the-shelf AI models don’t meet your specific needs or if using the same model as everyone else diminishes your competitive edge, building your own can be attractive. Microsoft clearly wanted AI tuned for its Copilot use cases and product ecosystem – something it can do more freely with in-house models. Likewise, other companies might have domain-specific data or use cases (e.g. a legal AI assistant, or an industrial AI for engineering data) where a general model underperforms. In such cases, investing in a proprietary model or at least a fine-tuned version of an open-source model could yield superior results for your niche. We’ve seen examples like Bloomberg GPT – a financial domain LLM trained on finance data – which a company built to get better finance-specific performance than generic models. Those successes hint that if your data or use case is unique enough, a custom model can provide real differentiation. Hybrid approaches – combine the best of both: Importantly, choosing “build” versus “buy” isn’t all-or-nothing. Microsoft itself is not abandoning OpenAI entirely; the company says it will “continue to use the very best models from [its] team, [its] partners, and the latest innovations from the open-source community” to power different features. In practice, Microsoft is adopting a hybrid model – using its own AI where it adds value, but also orchestrating third-party models where they excel, thereby delivering the best outcomes across millions of interactions. Other enterprises can adopt a similar strategy. For example, you might use a general model like OpenAI’s for most tasks, but switch to a privately fine-tuned model when handling proprietary data or domain-specific queries. There are even emerging tools to help route requests to different models dynamically (the way Microsoft’s “orchestrator” does). This approach allows you to leverage the immense investment big AI providers have made, while still maintaining options to plug in your own specialty models for particular needs. Bottom line: Microsoft’s foray into building MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 underscores that AI has become a strategic asset worth investing in – but it also demonstrates the importance of balancing innovation with practical business needs. Companies should re-evaluate their build-vs-buy AI strategy, especially if control, privacy, or differentiation are key drivers. Not every organization will choose to build a giant AI model from scratch (and most shouldn’t). Yet every organization should consider how dependent it wants to be on external AI providers and whether owning certain AI capabilities could unlock more value or mitigate risks. Microsoft’s example shows that with sufficient scale and strategic need, developing one’s own AI is not only possible but potentially transformative. For others, the lesson may be to negotiate harder on data and compliance terms with AI vendors, or to invest in smaller-scale bespoke models that complement the big players. In the end, Microsoft’s announcement is a landmark in the AI landscape: a reminder that the AI ecosystem is evolving from a few foundation-model providers toward a more heterogeneous field. For business leaders, it’s a prompt to think of AI not just as a service you consume, but as a capability you cultivate. Whether that means training your own models, fine-tuning open-source ones, or smartly leveraging vendor models, the goal is the same – align your AI strategy with your business’s unique needs for agility, trust, and competitive advantage in the AI era. Supporting Your AI Journey: Full-Spectrum AI Solutions from TTMS As the AI ecosystem evolves, TTMS offers AI Solutions for Business – a comprehensive service line that guides organizations through every stage of their AI strategy, from deploying pre-built models to developing proprietary ones. Whether you’re integrating AI into existing workflows, automating document-heavy processes, or building large-scale language or voice models, TTMS has capabilities to support you. For law firms, our AI4Legal specialization helps automate repetitive tasks like contract drafting, court transcript analysis, and document summarizations—all while maintaining data security and compliance. For customer-facing and sales-driven sectors, our Salesforce AI Integration service embeds generative AI, predictive insights, and automation directly into your CRM, helping improve user experience, reduce manual workload, and maintain control over data. If Microsoft’s move to build its own models signals one thing, it’s this: the future belongs to organizations that can both buy and build intelligently – and TTMS is ready to partner with you on that path. Why is Microsoft creating its own AI models when it already partners with OpenAI? Microsoft values the access it has to OpenAI’s cutting-edge models, but building MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 internally gives it more control over costs, product integration, and regulatory compliance. By owning the technology, Microsoft can optimize for speed and efficiency, protect sensitive data within its own infrastructure, and develop features tailored specifically to its ecosystem. This reduces dependence on a single provider and strengthens Microsoft’s long-term strategic position. How do Microsoft’s MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 compare with OpenAI’s models? MAI-1 is a large language model designed to rival GPT-4 in text-based tasks, but Microsoft emphasizes efficiency and integration rather than pushing absolute frontier performance. MAI-Voice-1 focuses on ultra-fast, natural-sounding speech generation, which complements OpenAI’s Whisper (speech-to-text) rather than duplicating it. While OpenAI still leads in some benchmarks, Microsoft’s models give it flexibility to innovate and align development closely with its own products. What are the risks for businesses in relying solely on third-party AI providers? Total dependence on external AI vendors creates exposure to pricing changes, roadmap shifts, or availability issues outside a company’s control. It can also complicate compliance when sensitive data must flow through a third party’s systems. Businesses risk losing differentiation if they rely on the same model that competitors use. Microsoft’s decision highlights these risks and shows why strategic independence in AI can be valuable. hat lessons can other enterprises take from Microsoft’s pivot? Not every company can afford to train a model on thousands of GPUs, but the principle is scalable. Organizations should assess which AI capabilities are core to their competitive advantage and consider building or fine-tuning models in those areas. For most, a hybrid approach – combining foundation models from providers with domain-specific custom models – strikes the right balance between speed, cost, and control. Microsoft demonstrates that owning at least part of the AI stack can pay dividends in trust, compliance, and differentiation. Will Microsoft continue to use OpenAI’s technology after launching its own models? Yes. Microsoft has been clear that it will use the best model for the task, whether from OpenAI, the open-source community, or its internal MAI family. The launch of MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 doesn’t replace OpenAI overnight; it creates options. This “multi-model” strategy allows Microsoft to route workloads dynamically, ensuring it can balance performance, cost, and compliance. For business leaders, it’s a reminder that AI strategies don’t need to be all-or-nothing – flexibility is a strength.

Read

TOP 7 AI Solutions Delivery Companies in 2025

Deepfake Detection Breakthrough: Universal Detector Achieves 98% Accuracy

Deepfake Detection Breakthrough: Universal Detector Achieves 98% Accuracy Imagine waking up to a viral video of your company’s CEO making outrageous claims – except it never happened. This nightmare scenario is becoming all too real as deepfakes (AI-generated fake videos or audio) grow more convincing. In response, researchers have unveiled a new universal deepfake detector that can spot synthetic videos with an unprecedented 98% accuracy. The development couldn’t be more timely, as businesses seek ways to protect their brand reputation and trust in an era when seeing is no longer believing. A powerful new AI tool can analyze videos and detect subtle signs of manipulation, helping companies distinguish real footage from deepfakes. The latest “universal” detector boasts cross-platform capabilities, flagging both fake videos and AI-generated audio with remarkable precision. It marks a significant advance in the fight against AI-driven disinformation. What is the 98% Accurate Universal Deepfake Detector and How Does It Work? The newly announced deepfake detector is an AI-driven system designed to identify fake video and audio content across virtually any platform. Developed by a team of researchers (notably at UC San Diego in August 2025), it represents a major leap forward in deepfake detection technology. Unlike earlier tools that were limited to specific deepfake formats, this “universal” detector works on both AI-generated speech and manipulated video footage. In other words, it can catch a lip-synced synthetic video of an executive and an impersonated voice recording with the same solution. Under the hood, the detector uses advanced machine learning techniques to sniff out the subtle “fingerprints” that generative AI leaves on fake content. When an image or video is created by AI rather than a real camera, there are tiny irregularities at the pixel level and in motion patterns that human eyes can’t easily see. The detector’s neural network has been trained to recognize these anomalies at the sub-pixel scale. For example, real videos have natural color correlations and noise characteristics from camera sensors, whereas AI-generated frames might have telltale inconsistencies in texture or lighting. By focusing on these hidden markers, the system can discern AI fakery without relying on obvious errors. Critically, this new detector doesn’t just focus on faces or one part of the frame – it scans the entire scene (backgrounds, movements, audio waveform, etc.) for anything that “doesn’t fit.” Earlier deepfake detectors often zeroed in on facial glitches (like unnatural eye blinking or odd skin textures) and could fail if no face was visible. In contrast, the universal model analyzes multiple regions per frame and across consecutive frames, catching subtle spatial and temporal inconsistencies that older methods missed. It’s a transformer-based AI model that essentially learns what real vs. fake looks like in a broad sense, instead of using one narrow trick. This breadth is what makes it universal – as one researcher put it, “It’s one model that handles all these scenarios… that’s what makes it universal”. Training Data and Testing: Building a Better Fake-Spotter Achieving 98% accuracy required feeding the detector a huge diet of both real and fake media. The researchers trained the system on an extensive range of AI-generated videos produced by different generator programs – from deepfake face-swaps to fully AI-created clips. For instance, they used samples from tools like Stable Diffusion’s video generator, Video-Crafter, and CogVideo to teach the AI what various fake “fingerprints” look like. By learning from many techniques, the model doesn’t get fooled by just one type of deepfake. Impressively, the team reported that the detector can even adapt to new deepfake methods after seeing only a few examples. This means if a brand-new AI video generator comes out next month, the detector could learn its telltale signs without needing a complete retraining. The results of testing this system have been record-breaking. In evaluations, the detector correctly flagged AI-generated videos about 98.3% of the time. This is a significant jump in accuracy compared to prior detection tools, which often struggled to get above the low 90s. In fact, the researchers benchmarked their model against eight different existing deepfake detection systems, and the new model outperformed all of them (the others ranged around 93% accuracy or lower). Such a high true-positive rate is a major milestone in the arms race against deepfakes. It suggests the AI can spot almost all fake content thrown at it, across a wide variety of sources. Of course, “98% accuracy” isn’t 100%, and that remaining 2% error rate does matter. With millions of videos uploaded online daily, even a small false-negative rate means some deepfakes will slip through, and a false-positive rate could flag some real videos incorrectly. Nonetheless, this detector’s performance is currently best-in-class. It gives organizations a fighting chance to catch malicious fakes that would have passed undetected just a year or two ago. As deepfake generation gets more advanced, detection had to step up – and this tool shows it’s possible to significantly close the gap. How Is This Detector Different from Past Deepfake Detection Methods? Previous deepfake detection methods were often specialized and easier to evade. One key difference is the new detector’s broad scope. Earlier detectors typically focused on specific artifacts – for example, one system might look for unnatural facial movements, while another analyzed lighting mismatches on a person’s face. These worked for certain deepfakes but failed for others. Many classic detectors also treated video simply as a series of individual images, trying to spot signs of Photoshop-style edits frame by frame. That approach falls apart when dealing with fully AI-generated video, which doesn’t have obvious cut-and-paste traces between frames. By contrast, the 98% accurate detector looks at the bigger picture (pun intended): it examines patterns over time and across the whole frame, not just isolated stills. Another major advancement is the detector’s ability to handle various formats and even modalities. Past solutions usually targeted one type of media at a time – for instance, a tool might detect face-swap video deepfakes but do nothing about an AI-cloned voice in an audio clip. The new universal detector can tackle both video and audio in one system, which is a game-changer. So if a deepfake involves a fake voice over a real video, or vice versa, older detectors might miss it, whereas this one catches the deception in either stream. Additionally, the architecture of this detector is more sophisticated. It employs a constrained neural network that homes in on anomalies in data distributions rather than searching for a predefined list of errors. Think of older methods like using a checklist (“Are the eyes blinking normally? Is the heartbeat visible on the neck?”) – effective until the deepfake creators fix those specific issues. The new method is more like an all-purpose lie detector for media; it learns the underlying differences between real and fake content, which are harder for forgers to eliminate. Also, unlike many legacy detectors that heavily relied on seeing a human face, this model doesn’t care if the content has people, objects, or scenery. For example, if someone fabricated a video of an empty office with fake background details, previous detectors might not notice anything since no face is present. The universal detector would still scrutinize the textures, shadows, and motion in the scene for unnatural signs. This makes it resilient against a broader array of deepfake styles. In summary, what sets this new detector apart is its universality and robustness. It’s essentially a single system that covers many bases: face swaps, entirely synthetic videos, fake voices, and more. Earlier generations of detectors were more narrow – they solved part of the problem. This one combines lessons from all those earlier efforts into a comprehensive tool. That breadth is vital because deepfake threats are evolving too. By solving the cross-platform compatibility issues that plagued older systems, the detector can maintain high accuracy even as deepfake techniques diversify. It’s the difference between a patchwork of local smoke detectors and a building-wide fire alarm system. Why This Matters for Brand Safety and Reputational Risk For businesses, deepfakes aren’t just an IT problem – they’re a serious brand safety and reputation risk. We live in a time where a single doctored video can go viral and wreak havoc on a company’s credibility. Imagine a fake video showing your CEO making unethical remarks or a bogus announcement of a product recall; such a hoax could send stock prices tumbling and customers fleeing before the truth gets out. Unfortunately, these scenarios have moved from hypothetical to real. Corporate targets are already in the crosshairs of deepfake fraudsters. In 2019, for example, criminals used an AI voice clone to impersonate a CEO and convinced an employee to wire $243,000 to a fraudulent account. By 2024, a multinational firm in Hong Kong was duped by an even more elaborate deepfake – a video call with a fake “CEO” and colleagues – resulting in a $25 million loss. The number of deepfake attacks against companies has surged, with AI-generated voices and videos duping financial firms out of millions and putting corporate security teams on high alert. Beyond direct financial theft, deepfakes pose a huge reputational threat. Brands spend years building trust, which a single viral deepfake can undermine in minutes. There have been cases of fake videos of political leaders and CEOs circulating online – even if debunked eventually, the damage in the interim can be significant. Consumers might question, “Was that real?” about any shocking video involving your brand. This uncertainty erodes the baseline of trust that businesses rely on. That’s why a detection tool with very high accuracy matters: it gives companies a fighting chance to identify and respond to fraudulent media quickly, before rumors and misinformation take on a life of their own. From a brand safety perspective, having a nearly foolproof deepfake detector is like having an early-warning radar for your reputation. It can help verify the authenticity of any suspicious video or audio featuring your executives, products, or partners. For example, if a doctored video of your CEO appears on social media, the detector could flag it within moments, allowing your team to alert the platform and your audience that it’s fake. Consider how valuable that is – it could be the difference between a contained incident and a full-blown PR crisis. In industries like finance, news media, and consumer goods, where public confidence is paramount, such rapid detection is a lifeline. As one industry report noted, this kind of tool is a “lifeline for companies concerned about brand reputation, misinformation, and digital trust”. It’s becoming essential for any organization that could be a victim of synthetic content abuse. Deepfakes have also introduced new vectors for fraud and misinformation that traditional security measures weren’t prepared for. Fake audio messages of a CEO asking an employee to transfer money, or a deepfake video of a company spokesperson giving false information about a merger, can bypass many people’s intuitions because we are wired to trust what we see and hear. Brand impersonation through deepfakes can mislead customers – for instance, a fake video “announcement” could trick people into a scam investment or phishing scheme using the company’s good name. The 98% accuracy detector, deployed properly, acts as a safeguard against these malicious uses. It won’t stop deepfakes from being made (just as security cameras don’t stop crimes by themselves), but it significantly boosts the chance of catching a fake in time to mitigate the harm. Incorporating Deepfake Detection into Business AI and Cybersecurity Strategies Given the stakes, businesses should proactively integrate deepfake detection tools into their overall security and risk management framework. A detector is not just a novelty for the IT department; it’s quickly becoming as vital as spam filters or antivirus software in the corporate world. Here are some strategic steps and considerations for companies looking to defend against deepfake threats: Employee Education and Policies: Train staff at all levels to be aware of deepfake scams and to verify sensitive communications. For example, employees should be skeptical of any urgent voice message or video that seems even slightly off. They must double-check unusual requests (especially involving money or confidential data) through secondary channels (like calling back a known number). Make it company policy that no major action is taken based on electronic communications alone without verification. Strengthen Verification Processes: Build robust verification protocols for financial transactions and executive communications. This might include multi-factor authentication for approvals, code words for confirming identity, or mandatory pause-and-verify steps for any request that seems odd. An incident in 2019 already highlighted that recognizing a voice is no longer enough to confirm someone’s identity – so treat video and audio with the same caution as you would a suspicious email. Deploy AI-Powered Detection Tools: Incorporate deepfake detection technology into your cybersecurity arsenal. Specialized software or services can analyze incoming content (emails with video attachments, voicemail recordings, social media videos about your brand) and flag possible fakes. Advanced AI detection systems can catch subtle inconsistencies in audio and video that humans would miss. Many tech and security firms are now offering detection as a service, and some social media platforms are building it into their moderation processes. Use these tools to automatically screen content – like an “anti-virus” for deepfakes – so you get alerts in real time. Regular Drills and Preparedness: Update your incident response plan to include deepfake scenarios. Conduct simulations (like a fake “CEO video” emergency drill) to test how your team would react. Just as companies run phishing simulations, run a deepfake drill to ensure your communications, PR, and security teams know the protocol if a fake video surfaces. This might involve quickly assembling a crisis team, notifying platform providers to take down the content, and issuing public statements. Practicing these steps can greatly reduce reaction time under real pressure. Monitor and Respond in Real Time: Assign personnel or use services to continuously monitor for mentions of your brand and key executives online. If a deepfake targeting your company does appear, swift action is crucial. The faster you identify it’s fake (with the help of detection AI) and respond publicly, the better you can contain false narratives. Have a clear response playbook: who assesses the content, who contacts legal and law enforcement if needed, and who communicates to the public. Being prepared can turn a potential nightmare into a managed incident. Integrating these measures ensures that your deepfake defense is both technical and human. No single tool is a silver bullet – even a 98% accurate detector works best in concert with good practices. Companies that have embraced these strategies treat deepfake risk as a when-not-if issue. They are actively “baking deepfake detection into their security and compliance practices,” as analysts advise. By doing so, businesses not only protect themselves from fraud and reputational damage but also bolster stakeholder confidence. In a world where AI can imitate anyone, a robust verification and detection strategy becomes a cornerstone of digital trust. Looking ahead, we can expect deepfake detectors to be increasingly common in enterprise security stacks. Just as spam filters and anti-malware became standard, content authentication and deepfake scanning will likely become routine. Forward-thinking companies are already exploring partnerships with AI firms to integrate detection APIs into their video conferencing and email systems. The investment in these tools is far cheaper than the cost of a major deepfake debacle. With threats evolving, businesses must stay one step ahead – and this 98% accuracy detector is a promising tool to help them do exactly that. Protect Your Business with TTMS AI Solutions At Transition Technologies MS (TTMS), we help organizations strengthen their defenses against digital threats by integrating cutting-edge AI tools into cybersecurity strategies. From advanced document analysis to knowledge management and e-learning systems, our AI-driven solutions are designed to ensure trust, compliance, and resilience in the digital age. Partner with TTMS to safeguard your brand reputation and prepare for the next generation of challenges in deepfake detection and beyond. FAQ How can you tell if a video is a deepfake without specialized tools? Even without an AI detector, there are some red flags that a video might be a deepfake. Look closely at the person’s face and movements – often, early deepfakes had unnatural eye blinking or facial expressions that seem “off.” Check for inconsistencies in lighting and shadows; sometimes the subject’s face lighting won’t perfectly match the scene. Audio can be a giveaway too: mismatched lip-sync or robotic-sounding voices might indicate manipulation. Pause on individual frames if possible – distorted or blurry details around the edges of faces (especially between transitions) can signal something is amiss. While these clues can help, sophisticated deepfakes today are much harder to spot with the naked eye, which is why tools and detectors are increasingly important. Are there laws or regulations addressing deepfakes that companies should know about? Regulation of deepfakes is starting to catch up as the technology’s impact grows. Different jurisdictions have begun introducing laws to deter malicious use of deepfakes. For example, China implemented regulations requiring that AI-generated media (deepfakes) be clearly labeled, and it bans the creation of deepfakes that could mislead the public or harm someone’s reputation. In the European Union, the upcoming AI Act treats manipulative AI content as high-risk and will likely enforce transparency obligations – meaning companies may need to disclose AI-generated content and could face penalties for harmful deepfake misuse. In the United States, there isn’t a blanket federal deepfake law yet, but some states have acted: Virginia was one of the first, criminalizing certain deepfake pornography and impersonations, and California and Texas have laws against deepfakes in elections. Additionally, existing laws on fraud, defamation, and identity theft can apply to deepfake scenarios (for instance, using a deepfake to commit fraud is still fraud). For businesses, this regulatory landscape means two things: you should refrain from unethical uses of deepfakes in your operations and marketing (to avoid legal trouble and backlash), and you should stay informed about emerging laws that protect victims of deepfakes – such laws might aid your company if you ever need to take legal action against parties making malicious fakes. It’s wise to consult legal experts on how deepfake-related regulations in your region could affect your compliance and response strategies. Can deepfake creators still fool a 98% accurate detector? It’s difficult but not impossible. A 98% accurate detector is extremely good, but determined adversaries are always looking for ways to evade detection. Researchers have shown that by adding specially crafted “noise” or artifacts (called adversarial examples) into a deepfake, they can sometimes trick detection models. It’s an AI cat-and-mouse game: as detectors improve, deepfake techniques adjust to become more sneaky. That said, fooling a top-tier detector requires a lot of expertise and effort – the average deepfake circulating online right now is unlikely to be that expertly concealed. The new universal detector raises the bar significantly, meaning most fakes out there will be caught. But we can expect deepfake creators to try developing countermeasures, so ongoing research and updated models will be needed. In short, 98% accurate doesn’t mean invincible, but it makes successful deepfake attacks much rarer. What should a company do if a deepfake of its CEO or brand goes public? Facing a deepfake attack on your company requires swift and careful action. First, internally verify the content – use detection tools (like the 98% accuracy detector) to confirm it’s fake, and gather any evidence of how it was created if possible. Activate your crisis response team immediately; this typically involves corporate communications, IT security, legal counsel, and executive leadership. Contact the platform where the video or audio is circulating and report it as fraudulent content – many social networks and websites have policies against deepfakes, especially those causing harm, and will remove them when alerted. Simultaneously, prepare a public statement or press release for your stakeholders. Be transparent and assertive: inform everyone that the video/audio is a fake and that malicious actors are attempting to mislead the public. If the deepfake could have legal ramifications (for example, stock manipulation or defamation), involve law enforcement or regulators as needed. Going forward, conduct a post-incident analysis to improve your response plan. By reacting quickly and communicating clearly, a company can often turn the tide and prevent lasting damage from a deepfake incident. Are deepfake detection tools available for businesses to use? Yes – while some cutting-edge detectors are still in the research phase, there are already tools on the market that businesses can leverage. A number of cybersecurity companies and AI startups offer deepfake detection services (often integrated into broader threat intelligence platforms). For instance, some provide APIs or software that can scan videos and audio for signs of manipulation. Big tech firms are also investing in this area; platforms like Facebook and YouTube have developed internal deepfake detection to police their content, and Microsoft released a deepfake detection tool (Video Authenticator) a few years ago. Moreover, open-source projects and academic labs have published deepfake detection models that savvy companies can experiment with. The new 98% accuracy “universal” detector itself may become commercially or publicly available after further development – if so, it could be deployed by businesses much like antivirus software. It’s worth noting that effective use of these tools also requires human oversight. Businesses should assign trained staff or partner with vendors to implement the detectors correctly and interpret the alerts. In summary, while no off-the-shelf solution is perfect, a variety of deepfake detection options do exist and are maturing rapidly.

Read

ChatGPT 5 Modes: Auto, Fast (Instant), Thinking, Pro – Which Mode to Use and Why?

Unlocking ChatGPT 5 Modes: How Auto, Fast, Thinking, and Pro Really Work Most of us use ChatGPT on autopilot – we type a question and wait for the AI to answer, without ever wondering if there are different modes to choose from. Yet these modes do exist, though they’re a bit tucked away in the interface and less visible than they once were. You can find them in the model picker, usually under options like Auto, Fast, Thinking, or Pro, and they each change how the AI works. But is it really worth exploring them? And how do they impact speed, accuracy, and even cost? That’s exactly what we’ll uncover in this article. ChatGPT 5 introduces several modes of operation – Auto, Fast (sometimes called Instant), Thinking, and Pro – as well as access to older model versions. If you’re wondering what each of these modes does, when to switch between them (if at all), and how they differ in speed, quality, and cost, this comprehensive guide will clarify everything. We’ll also discuss which modes are best suited for everyday users versus business or professional users. Each mode in GPT-5 is designed for a different balance of speed and reasoning depth. Below, we answer the key questions about these modes in an SEO-friendly Q&A format, so you can quickly find the information you need. 1. What are the new modes in ChatGPT 5 and why do they exist? ChatGPT 5 (GPT-5) has transformed the old model selection into a unified system with four mode options: Auto, Fast, Thinking, and Pro. These modes exist to let the AI adjust how much “thinking” (computational effort and reasoning time) it should use for a given query: Auto Mode: This is the default unified mode. GPT-5 automatically decides whether to respond quickly or engage deeper reasoning based on your question’s complexity. Fast Mode: A mode for instant answers – GPT-5 responds very quickly with minimal extra reasoning. (This is essentially GPT-5’s standard mode for everyday queries.) Thinking Mode: A deep reasoning mode – GPT-5 will take longer to formulate an answer, performing more analysis and step-by-step reasoning for complex tasks. Pro Mode: A “research-grade” mode – the most advanced and thorough option. GPT-5 will use maximum computing power (even running parts of the task in parallel) to produce the most accurate and detailed answer possible. These modes were introduced because GPT-5 is capable of dynamically adjusting its reasoning. In previous versions like GPT-4, users had to manually pick between different models (e.g. standard vs. advanced reasoning models). Now GPT-5 consolidates that into one system with modes, making it easier to get the right balance of speed vs. depth without constantly switching models. The Auto mode in particular means most users can just ask questions normally and let ChatGPT decide if a quick answer will do or if it should “think longer” for a better result. 2. How does ChatGPT 5’s Auto mode work? The Auto mode is the intelligent default that makes GPT-5 decide on the fly how much reasoning is needed. When you have GPT-5 set to Auto, it will typically answer straightforward questions using the Fast approach for speed. If you ask a more complex or multi-step question, the system can automatically invoke the Thinking mode behind the scenes to give a more carefully reasoned answer. In practice, Auto mode means you don’t have to manually select a model for most situations. GPT-5’s internal “router” analyzes your prompt and chooses the appropriate strategy: For a simple prompt (like “Summarize this paragraph” or “What’s the capital of France?”), GPT-5 will likely respond almost immediately (using the Fast response mode). For a complex prompt (like “Analyze this financial report and give insights” or a tricky coding/debugging question), GPT-5 may “think” for a bit longer before answering. You might notice a brief indication that it’s reasoning more deeply. This is GPT-5 automatically switching into its Thinking mode to ensure it works through the problem. Auto mode is ideal for most users because it delivers the best of both worlds: quick answers when possible, and more thorough answers when necessary. You can always override it by manually picking Fast or Thinking, but Auto means less guesswork – the AI itself decides how long to think. If you ever explicitly want it to take its time, you can even tell GPT-5 in your prompt to “think carefully about this,” which encourages the system to engage deeper reasoning. Tip: When GPT-5 Auto decides to think longer, the interface will indicate it. You usually have an option to “Get a quick answer” if you don’t want to wait for the full reasoning. This allows you to interrupt the deep thinking and force a faster (but potentially less detailed) reply, giving you control even in Auto mode. 3. What is the Fast (Instant) mode in GPT-5 used for? The Fast mode (labeled “Fast – instant answers” in the ChatGPT model picker) is designed for speedy responses. In Fast mode, GPT-5 will generate an answer as quickly as possible without dedicating extra time to extensive reasoning. Essentially, this is GPT-5’s standard mode for everyday tasks that don’t require heavy analysis. When to use Fast mode: Simple or routine queries: If you’re asking something straightforward (factual questions, brief explanations, casual conversation), Fast mode will give you an answer within a few seconds. Brainstorming and creative prompts: Need a quick list of ideas or a first draft of a tweet/blog? Fast mode is usually sufficient and time-efficient. General coding help: For small coding questions or debugging minor errors, Fast mode can provide answers quickly. GPT-5’s base capability is already high, so for many coding tasks you might not need the extra reasoning. Everyday business tasks: Writing an email, summarizing a document, responding to a common customer query – Fast mode handles these with speed and improved accuracy (GPT-5 is noted to have fewer random mistakes than GPT-4 did, even in its fast responses). In Fast mode, GPT-5 is still quite powerful and more reliable than older GPT-4 models for common tasks. It’s also cost-efficient (lower compute usage means fewer tokens consumed, which matters if you have usage limits or are paying per token via the API). The trade-off is that it might not catch extremely subtle details or perform multi-step reasoning as well as the Thinking mode would. However, for the vast majority of prompts that are not highly complex, Fast mode’s answers are both quick and accurate. This is why Fast (or “Standard”) mode serves as the backbone for day-to-day interactions with ChatGPT 5. 4. When should you use the GPT-5 Thinking mode? GPT-5’s Thinking mode is meant for situations where you need extra accuracy, depth, or complex problem-solving. When you manually switch to Thinking mode, ChatGPT will deliberately take more time (and tokens) to work through your query step by step, almost like an expert “thinking out loud” internally before giving you a result. You should use Thinking mode for tasks where a quick off-the-cuff answer might not be good enough. Use GPT-5 Thinking mode when: The problem is complex or multi-step: If you ask a tough math word problem, a complex programming challenge, or an analytical question (e.g. “What are the implications of this scientific study’s results?”), Thinking mode will yield a more structured and correct solution. It’s designed to handle advanced reasoning tasks like these with higher accuracy. Precision matters: For example, drafting a legal clause, analyzing financial data for trends, or writing a medical report summary. In such cases, mistakes can be costly, so you want the AI to be as careful as possible. Thinking mode reduces the chance of errors and hallucinations even further by allocating more computation to verify facts and logic. Technical or detailed writing: If you need longer, well-thought-out content – such as an in-depth explanation of a concept, thorough documentation, or a step-by-step guide – the Thinking mode can produce a more comprehensive answer. It’s like giving the model extra time to gather its thoughts and double-check itself before responding. Coding complex projects: For debugging a large codebase, solving a tricky algorithm, or generating non-trivial code (like a full module or a complex function), Thinking mode performs significantly better. It’s been observed to greatly improve coding accuracy and can handle more elaborate tasks like multi-language code coordination or intricate logic that Fast mode might get wrong. Trade-offs: In Thinking mode, responses are slower. You might wait somewhere on the order of 10-30 seconds (depending on the complexity of your request) for an answer, instead of the usual 2-5 seconds in Fast mode. It also uses more tokens and computing resources, meaning it’s more expensive to run. If you’re on ChatGPT Plus, there are even usage limits for how many Thinking-mode messages you can send per week (because each such response is heavy on the system). However, those downsides are often justified when the question is important enough. The mode can deliver dramatically improved accuracy – for example, internal OpenAI benchmarks showed huge jumps in performance (several-fold improvements on certain expert tasks) when GPT-5 is allowed to think longer. In summary, switch to Thinking mode for high-stakes or highly complex prompts where you want the best possible answer and you’re willing to wait a bit longer for it. For everyday quick queries, it’s not necessary – the default fast responses will do. Many Plus users might use Thinking mode sparingly for those tough questions, while relying on Auto/Fast for everything else. 5. What does GPT-5 Pro mode offer, and who really needs it? GPT-5 Pro mode is the most advanced and resource-intensive mode available in ChatGPT 5. It’s often described as “research-grade intelligence.” This mode is only available to users on the highest-tier plans (ChatGPT Pro or ChatGPT Business plans) and is intended for enterprise-level or critical tasks that demand maximum accuracy and thoroughness. Here’s what Pro mode offers and who benefits from it: Maximum accuracy through parallel reasoning: GPT-5 Pro doesn’t just think longer; it also can think more broadly. Under the hood, Pro mode can run multiple reasoning threads in parallel (imagine consulting an entire panel of AI experts simultaneously) and then synthesize the best answer. This leads to even more refined responses with fewer mistakes. In testing, GPT-5 Pro set new records on difficult academic and professional benchmarks, outperforming the standard Thinking mode in many cases. Use cases for Pro: This mode shines in high-stakes, mission-critical scenarios: Scientific research and healthcare: e.g. analyzing complex biomedical data, discovering drug candidates, or interpreting medical imaging results (where absolute precision is vital). Finance and legal: e.g. risk modeling, auditing complex financial portfolios, generating or reviewing legal contracts with extreme accuracy – tasks where an error could cost a lot of money or have legal implications. Large-scale enterprise analytics: e.g. processing lengthy confidential reports, performing deep market analysis, or powering a virtual assistant that needs to reliably handle very complex queries from users. AI development: If you’re a developer building AI-driven applications (like agents that plan and act autonomously), GPT-5 Pro provides the most consistent reasoning depth and reliability for those advanced applications. Who needs Pro: Generally, businesses and professionals with intensive needs. For a casual user or even most power-users, the standard GPT-5 (and occasional Thinking mode) is usually enough. Pro mode is targeted at enterprise users, research institutions, or AI enthusiasts who require that extra edge in performance – and are willing to pay a premium for it. Drawbacks of Pro mode: The word “Pro” implies it’s not for everyone. First, it’s expensive – both in terms of subscription cost and computational cost. As of 2025, ChatGPT Pro subscriptions run at a much higher price (around $200 per month) compared to the standard Plus plan, and that buys you the privilege of using this powerful mode without the normal usage caps. Also, each Pro mode response consumes a lot of compute (and tokens), so from an API or cost perspective it’s the priciest option (roughly double the token cost of Thinking mode, and ~10 times the cost of a quick response). Second, speed: Pro mode is the slowest to respond. Because it’s doing so much work under the hood, you might wait 20-40 seconds or more for a single answer. In interactive chat, that can feel lengthy. Lastly, Pro mode currently has a couple of limitations in features (for instance, certain ChatGPT tools like image generation or the canvas feature may not be enabled with GPT-5 Pro, due to its specialized nature). Bottom line: GPT-5 Pro is a potent tool if you truly need the highest level of AI reasoning and are in an environment where accuracy outweighs all other concerns (and cost is justified by the value of the results). It’s likely overkill for everyday needs. Most users, even many developers, won’t need Pro mode regularly. It’s more for organizations or individuals tackling problems where that extra 5-10% improvement in quality is worth the extra expense and time. 6. How do the modes differ in speed and answer quality? Each mode in ChatGPT 5 strikes a different balance between speed and the depth/quality of the answer: Fast mode is the quickest: It typically responds within a couple of seconds for a prompt. The answers are high-quality for normal questions (much better than older GPT-3.5 or even GPT-4 in many cases), but Fast mode will not always catch very subtle nuances or deeply reason through complicated instructions. Think of Fast mode answers as “good enough and very fast” for general purposes. Thinking mode is slower but more thorough: When GPT-5 Thinking is engaged, response times slow down (often 10-30 seconds depending on complexity). The quality of the answers, however, is more robust and detailed. GPT-5 Thinking will handle multi-step reasoning tasks significantly better. For example, if a Fast mode answer might occasionally miscalculate or simplify a complex answer, the Thinking mode is far more likely to get it correct and provide justification or step-by-step details in its response. In terms of quality, you can expect far fewer factual errors or “hallucinations” in Thinking mode responses, since the AI took extra time to verify and cross-check its answer internally. Pro mode is the most meticulous (and slowest): GPT-5 Pro will take even more time than Thinking mode for a response, as it uses maximum compute. It might explore several potential solutions internally before finalizing an answer, which maximizes the quality and correctness. The answers from Pro mode are usually the most detailed, well-structured, and accurate. You might notice they contain deeper insights or handle edge cases that the other modes might miss. The trade-off is that Pro mode responses can easily take half a minute or more, and you wouldn’t use it unless you truly need that level of depth. In summary: Speed: Fast > Thinking > Pro (Fast is fastest, Pro is slowest). Answer depth/quality: Pro > Thinking > Fast (Pro gives the most advanced answers, Fast gives concise answers). Everyday effectiveness: For most simple queries, all modes will do fine; you won’t necessarily notice a quality difference on an easy question. The differences become apparent on challenging tasks. Fast mode might give a decent but not perfect answer, Thinking mode will give a correct and well-explained answer, and Pro mode will give an exceptionally detailed answer with minimal chance of error. It’s also worth noting that GPT-5’s base quality (even in Fast mode) is a leap over previous generations. Many users find that even quick answers from GPT-5 are more accurate and nuanced than what GPT-4 produced. So speed doesn’t degrade quality as much as you might think for typical questions – it mainly matters when the question is particularly difficult. 7. Do different GPT-5 modes use more tokens or cost more to use? Yes, the modes do differ in terms of token usage and cost, though it might not be obvious at first glance. The general rule is: the more thinking a mode does, the more tokens and cost it will incur. Here’s how it breaks down: Fast mode (Standard GPT-5): This mode is the most token-efficient. It generates answers quickly without a lot of internal computation, so it tends to use only the tokens needed for the answer itself. If you’re using the ChatGPT subscription, there’s no direct “cost” per message beyond your subscription, but Fast mode also consumes your message quota more slowly (because each answer is concise and doesn’t involve hidden extra tokens). If you were using the API, Fast mode’s underlying model has the lowest price per 1000 tokens (OpenAI has indicated something on the order of $0.002 per 1K tokens for GPT-5 Standard, which is even a bit cheaper than GPT-4 was). Thinking mode: This mode is resource-intensive, meaning it will use more tokens internally to reason through the problem. When GPT-5 “thinks,” it might be effectively doing multi-step reasoning which uses up extra tokens behind the scenes (these don’t all show up in the answer, but they count towards computation). The cost per token for this mode is higher (roughly 5× the cost of standard mode on the API side). In ChatGPT Plus, using Thinking mode too often is limited – for instance, Plus users can only initiate a certain number of Thinking-mode messages per week (because each one is expensive to run on the server). So effectively, each Thinking response “costs” much more in terms of your usage allowance. In practical terms, expect that a deep Thinking answer might consume significantly more of your message limits than a quick answer would. Pro mode: Pro mode is the most expensive per use. It not only carries a higher token cost (approximately double that of Thinking mode per token, or about 10× the base cost of Fast mode), but it often produces longer answers and does a lot of work internally. This is why Pro mode is reserved for the highest-paying tier – it would be infeasible to offer unlimited Pro responses at a low price point. If you have a Pro subscription or enterprise access, you effectively have no hard limit on GPT-5 usage, but your cost is the hefty monthly fee instead. If you were using an API equivalent, Pro mode would be quite costly per 1000 tokens. The benefit is that because Pro is so accurate, in theory you might save money by not having to repeat queries or fix mistakes – but you’d only worry about that if you’re using GPT-5 for high-value tasks. In terms of token usage in answers, deeper modes often yield longer, more detailed replies (especially if the task warrants it). That means more output tokens. Also, they reduce the chance you’ll need to ask follow-up questions or clarifications (which themselves would consume more tokens), which is another way they can be “cost-effective” despite higher per-message cost. But if you’re on the free plan or Plus, the main thing to know is that the heavy modes will hit your usage limits faster: Free users only get a very limited number of GPT-5 messages and just 1 Thinking-mode use per day on free tier. This is because Thinking uses a lot of resources. Plus users get more (currently around 160 messages per 3 hours for GPT-5, and up to 3,000 Thinking messages per week maximum). If a Plus user sticks to Fast/Auto primarily, they can get a lot of answers within those caps; if they use Thinking for every query, they’ll hit weekly limits much sooner. Pro/Business users have “unlimited” use, but that comes at the high subscription cost. So, in conclusion, each mode does “cost” differently: Fast mode is cheapest and most token-efficient, Thinking mode costs several times more per question, and Pro is premium priced. If you’re concerned about token usage (say, for API billing or hitting message caps), use the heavier modes only when needed. Otherwise, the Auto mode will handle it for you, using extra tokens only when it determines the value of a better answer is worth the cost. 8. Should you manually switch modes or let ChatGPT decide automatically? For most users, letting GPT-5 Auto mode handle it is the simplest and often the best approach. The auto-switching system was built to spare you from micromanaging the model’s behavior. By default, GPT-5 will not waste time “overthinking” an easy question, and similarly it won’t give you a shallow answer to a really complex prompt – it will adjust as needed. That said, there are scenarios where manually choosing a mode makes sense: When you know you need a deep analysis: If you’re about to ask something very complex and you want to ensure the highest accuracy (and you have access to Thinking mode), you might manually switch to Thinking mode before asking. This guarantees GPT-5 spends maximum effort, rather than waiting to see if it might decide to do so. For example, a data scientist preparing a detailed report might directly use Thinking mode for each query to get thorough answers. When you’re in a hurry for a simple answer: If GPT-5 (Auto) starts “Thinking…” but you actually just want a quick answer or a brainstorm, you can click “Get a quick answer” or simply switch to Fast mode for that question. Sometimes the AI might be overly cautious and begin deep reasoning when you didn’t need it – in those cases, forcing Fast mode will save you time. When conserving usage: If you’re on a limited plan and near your cap, you might stick to Fast mode to maximize the number of questions you can ask, since Thinking mode would burn through your quota faster. Conversely, if you have plenty of headroom and need a top-notch answer, you can use Thinking mode more liberally. Using Pro mode deliberately: If you’re one of the users with Pro access, you’ll likely switch to Pro mode only for the most critical queries. It doesn’t make sense to use Pro for every single chat message due to the slower speed – better to reserve it for when you have a genuinely high-value question that justifies it. In short, Auto mode is usually sufficient and is the recommended default for both casual and many professional interactions. You only need to manually switch modes in special cases: either to force extra rigor or to force extra speed. Think of manual mode switching as an override for the AI’s decisions. The system’s pretty good at picking the right mode on its own, but you remain in control if you disagree with its choice. 9. Are older models like GPT-4 still available in ChatGPT 5? Yes, older models are still accessible in the ChatGPT interface under a “Legacy models” section – but you may not need to use them often. With the rollout of GPT-5: GPT-4 (often labeled GPT-4o or other variants) is available to paid users as a legacy option. If you have a Plus, Business, or Pro account, you can find GPT-4 in the model picker under legacy models. This is mainly provided for compatibility or specific use cases where someone might want to compare answers or use an older model on prior conversations. Additionally, OpenAI has allowed access to some intermediate models (like GPT-4.1, GPT-4.5, or older 3.5 models often labeled as o3, o4-mini, etc.) for certain subscription tiers, but these are hidden unless you enable “Show additional models” in your settings. Plus users, for example, can see a few of those, while Pro users can see slightly more (like GPT-4.5). By default, if you don’t specifically switch to an older model, all your chats will use GPT-5 (Auto mode). And if you open an old chat that was originally with GPT-4, the system may automatically load it with the GPT-5 equivalent to continue the conversation. So OpenAI has tried to transition seamlessly such that GPT-5 handles most things going forward. Do you need the older models? For the majority of cases, no. GPT-5’s Standard/Fast mode is intended to replace GPT-4 for everyday use, and it’s better at almost everything. There might be a rare instance where an older model had a particular style or a specific capability you want to replicate – then you could switch to it. But generally, GPT-5’s intelligence and the Auto mode’s adaptability mean you won’t often have to manually use GPT-4 or others. In fact, some of the older GPT-4 variants might be slower or have lower context length compared to GPT-5, so unless you have a compatibility reason, it’s best to let GPT-5 take over. One thing to note: if you exceed certain usage limits with GPT-5 (especially on the free tier), ChatGPT will automatically fall back to a “GPT-5 mini” or even GPT-3.5 temporarily until your limit resets. This is done behind the scenes to ensure free users always get some service. In the UI, it might not clearly say it switched, but the quality might differ. Paid users won’t experience this fallback except when they intentionally use legacy models. In summary, older models are there if you need them, but GPT-5’s modes are now the main focus and cover almost all use cases that older models did – typically with better results. 10. Which GPT-5 mode is best for business users versus general users? The choice of mode can depend on who you are and what you’re trying to accomplish. Let’s break it down for individual (general) users and business users or professionals: General Users / Individuals: If you’re an everyday user (for personal projects, learning, or casual use), you’ll likely be perfectly satisfied with the default GPT-5 Auto mode, using Fast responses most of the time and occasionally letting it dip into Thinking mode when you ask a harder question. A ChatGPT Plus subscription might be worthwhile if you use it very frequently, since it gives you more GPT-5 usage and access to manual Thinking mode when you need it. However, you probably do not need GPT-5 Pro mode. The Pro tier is expensive and geared toward unlimited heavy use, which average users don’t usually require. In short, general users should stick with the standard GPT-5 (Auto/Fast) for speed and ease, and use Thinking mode for those few cases where you want a deep dive answer. This will keep your costs low (or your Plus subscription fully sufficient) while still giving you excellent results. Business Users / Professionals: For business purposes, the stakes and scale often increase. If you run a business integrating ChatGPT, or you’re using it in a professional setting (for instance, to assist with your work in finance, law, engineering, customer service, etc.), you need to consider accuracy and reliability carefully: Small Business or Plus for Professionals: Many professional users will find that a Plus account with GPT-5’s Thinking mode available is enough. You can manually invoke Thinking mode for those complex tasks like data analysis or report generation, ensuring high quality when needed, while keeping most interactions quick and efficient in standard mode. This approach is cost-effective and likely sufficient unless your domain is extremely sensitive. Enterprises or High-Stakes Use: If you’re an enterprise user or your work involves critical decision-making (say, a medical AI tool, or a financial firm doing big analyses), GPT-5 Pro might be worth the investment. Businesses benefit from Pro mode’s extra accuracy and from the unlimited usage it offers. There’s no worry about hitting message caps, which is important if you have many employees or customers interacting with the system. Moreover, the larger context window on the Pro plan (GPT-5 Pro supports dramatically bigger inputs, up to 128K tokens context for Fast and ~196K for Thinking, according to OpenAI) allows analysis of very large documents or datasets in one go – a huge plus for enterprise use cases. Cost-Benefit: Businesses should weigh the cost of the Pro subscription (or Business plan) against the value of the improved outputs. If a single mistake avoided by Pro mode could save your company thousands of dollars, then using Pro mode is justified. On the other hand, if your use of AI is more routine (like answering common customer questions or writing marketing content), the standard GPT-5 might already be more than capable, and a Plus plan at a fraction of the cost will do the job. In summary, for general users: stick with Auto/Fast, use Thinking sparingly, and you likely don’t need Pro. For business users: start with GPT-5’s standard and Thinking modes; if you find their limits (in accuracy or usage caps) hindering your mission-critical tasks, then consider upgrading to Pro mode. GPT-5 Pro is predominantly aimed at businesses, research labs, and power users who truly need that unparalleled performance and can justify the expense. Everyone else will find GPT-5’s default modes already a significant upgrade that addresses both casual and moderately complex needs effectively. 11. Final Thoughts: Getting the Most Out of ChatGPT 5’s Modes ChatGPT 5’s new modes – Auto, Fast, Thinking, and Pro – give you a flexible toolkit to get the exact type of answer you need, when you need it. For most people, letting Auto mode handle things is easiest, ensuring you get fast responses for simple questions and deeper analysis for tough ones without manual effort. The system is designed to optimize speed and intelligence automatically. However, it’s great that you have the freedom to choose: if you ever feel a response needs to be more immediate or more thorough, you can toggle to the corresponding mode. Keep an eye on how each mode performs for your use case: Use Fast mode for quick, on-the-fly Q&A and save precious time. Invoke Thinking mode for those problems where you’d rather wait a few extra seconds and be confident in the answer’s accuracy and detail. Reserve Pro mode for the rare instances where only the best will do (and if your resources allow for it). Remember, all GPT-5 modes leverage the same underlying advancements that make this model more capable than its predecessors: improved factual accuracy, better following of instructions, and more context capacity. Whether you’re a curious individual user or a business deploying AI at scale, understanding these modes will help you harness GPT-5 effectively while managing speed, quality, and cost according to your needs. Happy chatting with GPT-5! 12. Want More Than Chat Modes? Discover Bespoke AI Services from TTMS ChatGPT is powerful, but sometimes you need more than a mode toggle – you need custom AI solutions built for your business. That’s where TTMS comes in. We offer tailored services that go beyond what any off-the-shelf mode can do: AI Solutions for Business – end-to-end AI integration to automate workflows and unlock operational efficiency. (See https://ttms.com/ai-solutions-for-business/) Anti-Money Laundering Software Solutions – AI-powered AML systems that help meet regulatory compliance with precision and speed. (See https://ttms.com/anti-money-laundry-software-solutions/) AI4Legal – legal-tech tools using AI to support contract drafting, review, and risk analysis. (See https://ttms.com/ai4legal/) AI Document Analysis Tool – extract, validate, and summarize information from documents automatically and reliably. (See https://ttms.com/ai-document-analysis-tool/) AI-E-Learning Authoring Tool – build intelligent training and learning modules that adapt and scale. (See https://ttms.com/ai-e-learning-authoring-tool/) AI-Based Knowledge Management System – structure and retrieve organizational knowledge in smarter, faster ways. (See https://ttms.com/ai-based-knowledge-management-system/) AI Content Localization Services – localize content across languages and cultures, using AI to maintain nuance and consistency. (See https://ttms.com/ai-content-localization-services/) If your goals include saving time, reducing costs, and having AI work for you rather than just alongside you, let’s talk. TTMS crafts AI tools not just for “general mode” but for your exact use case – so you get speed when you need speed, and depth when you need rigor. Does switching between ChatGPT modes change the creativity of answers? Yes, the choice of mode can influence how creative or structured the output feels. In Fast mode, responses are more direct and efficient, which is useful for brainstorming short lists of ideas or generating quick drafts. Thinking mode, on the other hand, allows ChatGPT to explore more options and refine its reasoning, which often leads to more original or nuanced results in storytelling, marketing, or creative writing. Pro mode takes this even further, producing well-polished, highly detailed content, but it comes with longer wait times and higher costs. Which ChatGPT mode is most reliable for coding? For simple coding tasks such as generating small functions, fixing syntax errors, or writing snippets, Fast mode usually performs well and delivers answers quickly. However, when working on complex projects that involve debugging large codebases, designing algorithms, or ensuring higher reliability, Thinking mode is a better choice. Pro mode is reserved for scenarios where absolute precision matters, such as enterprise-level software or mission-critical applications. In short: use Fast for convenience, Thinking for accuracy, and Pro only when failure isn’t an option. Do ChatGPT modes affect memory or context length? The modes themselves don’t directly change the memory of your conversation or the context size. All GPT-5 modes share the same underlying architecture, but the subscription tier determines the maximum context length available. For example, Pro plans unlock significantly larger context windows, which makes it possible to analyze or generate content across hundreds of pages of text. So while Fast, Thinking, and Pro modes behave differently in terms of reasoning depth, the real impact on memory and context length comes from the plan you are using rather than the mode itself. Can free users access all ChatGPT modes? No, free users have very limited access. Typically, the free tier allows only Fast (Auto) mode, with an occasional option to test Thinking mode under strict daily limits. Access to Pro mode is reserved exclusively for paid subscribers on the highest tier. Plus subscribers can use Auto and Thinking regularly, but only Business or Pro users have unrestricted access to the full range of modes. This limitation is due to the high computational costs associated with Thinking and Pro modes. Is there a risk in always using Pro mode? The main “risk” of using Pro mode is not about accuracy, but about practicality. Pro mode delivers the most thorough and precise results, but it is also the slowest and the most expensive option. If you rely on it for every single question, you may find that you’re spending more time and resources than necessary for simple tasks that Fast or Thinking could easily handle. For most users, Pro should be reserved for the toughest or most critical challenges. Otherwise, it’s more efficient to let Auto mode decide or to use Fast for everyday queries. Does ChatGPT switch modes automatically, or do I need to do it manually? ChatGPT 5 offers both options. In Auto mode, the system decides automatically whether a quick response is enough or if it should engage in deeper reasoning. That means you don’t need to worry about switching manually – the AI adjusts to the complexity of your query on its own. However, if you prefer full control, you can always manually select Fast, Thinking, or Pro in the model picker. In practice, Auto is recommended for everyday use, while manual switching makes sense if you explicitly want either maximum speed or maximum accuracy.

Read

Top 10 Polish IT Providers for the Pharma Sector in 2025

Top 10 IT Companies in Poland Serving the Pharmaceutical Industry (2025 Ranking) The pharmaceutical industry relies on advanced IT solutions – from clinical data management and AI-driven drug discovery to secure patient portals and regulatory compliance systems. Poland’s tech sector hosts a range of providers experienced in delivering these solutions for pharma companies. Below is a ranking of the Top 10 Polish IT service providers for the pharma sector in 2025. These companies combine technical excellence with domain knowledge in life sciences, helping pharma organizations innovate while meeting strict regulations. Each entry includes key facts like 2024 revenue and workforce size, as well as main service areas. 1. Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) TTMS leads the pack as a Poland-headquartered IT partner with deep expertise in pharmaceutical projects. Operating since 2015, TTMS has grown rapidly by delivering scalable, high-quality software and managed IT services for regulated industries. The company’s 800+ specialists support global pharma clients in areas ranging from clinical trial management systems to validated cloud platforms. TTMS stands out for its AI-driven solutions – for example, implementing artificial intelligence to automate tender analysis and improve drug development pipelines. As a certified partner of Microsoft, Adobe, Salesforce, and more, TTMS offers end-to-end support, from quality management and computer system validation to custom application development. Its strong pharma portfolio (including case studies in AI for R&D and digital engagement) underscores TTMS’s ability to combine innovation with compliance. TTMS: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 233.7 million Number of employees: 800+ Website: https://ttms.com/pharma-software-development-services/ Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: AEM, Azure, Power Apps, Salesforce, BI, AI, Webcon, e-learning, Quality Management 2. Sii Poland Sii Poland is the country’s largest IT outsourcing and engineering company, with a substantial track record in the pharma domain. Founded in 2006, Sii has over 7,700 professionals and offers broad expertise – from software development and testing to infrastructure management and business process outsourcing. Its teams have supported pharmaceutical clients by developing laboratory information systems, validating applications for FDA compliance, and providing IT specialists (e.g. data analysts, QA engineers) under flexible outsourcing models. With 16 offices across Poland and a reputation for quality delivery, Sii can execute large-scale pharma IT projects while ensuring GxP standards and data security are met. Sii Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 2.13 billion Number of employees: 7700+ Website: www.sii.pl Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: IT outsourcing, engineering, software development, BPO, testing, infrastructure services 3. Asseco Poland Asseco Poland is the largest Polish-owned IT group and a powerhouse in delivering technology to regulated sectors. With origins dating back to 1991, Asseco today operates in over 60 countries (33,000+ staff globally) and reported PLN 17.1 billion in 2024 revenue (group level). In the pharmaceutical field, Asseco leverages its experience in enterprise software to offer validated IT systems, data integration, and software outsourcing services. The company’s portfolio includes healthcare and life-sciences solutions – from hospital and laboratory systems to drug distribution platforms – ensuring interoperability and compliance with EU and FDA regulations. Asseco’s deep R&D capabilities and local presence (headquartered in Rzeszów with major offices across Poland) make it a trusted partner for pharma companies seeking long-term, reliable IT development and support. Asseco Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 17.1 billion (group) Number of employees: 33,000+ (global) Website: pl.asseco.com Headquarters: Rzeszów, Poland Main services / focus: Proprietary software products, custom system development, IT outsourcing, digital government solutions, life sciences IT 4. Comarch Comarch, founded in 1993, is a leading Polish IT provider with a strong footprint in healthcare and industry. With 6,500+ employees and 20+ offices in Poland, Comarch blends product development with IT services. In the pharma and medtech sector, Comarch’s Healthcare division offers solutions like electronic health record platforms, remote patient monitoring, and telemedicine systems – all crucial for pharma companies engaged in clinical research or patient support programs. Comarch also provides custom software development, integration, and IT outsourcing services, tailoring its broad portfolio (ERP, CRM, business intelligence, IoT) to the needs of pharmaceutical clients. Known for robust R&D and secure infrastructure (including its own data centers), Comarch helps pharma firms improve operational efficiency and data-driven decision making. Comarch: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 1.916 billion Number of employees: 6500+ Website: www.comarch.com Headquarters: Kraków, Poland Main services / focus: Healthcare IT (EHR, telemedicine), ERP & CRM systems, custom software development, cloud services, IoT solutions 5. Euvic Euvic is a fast-growing Polish IT group that has become a major player through the federation of dozens of tech companies. With around 5,000 IT specialists and an estimated PLN 2 billion in annual revenue, Euvic delivers a wide spectrum of IT services. For pharmaceutical clients, Euvic’s team offers everything from custom application development and integration (e.g. R&D data platforms, CRM for pharma sales) to analytics and cloud infrastructure management. The group’s decentralized structure allows it to tap specialized skills (AI, data science, mobile, etc.) across its subsidiaries. This means a pharma company can find in Euvic a one-stop partner for digital transformation – whether implementing a secure patient mobile app, automating supply chain processes, or migrating legacy systems to the cloud. Euvic’s scale and flexible engagement models have made it a preferred IT vendor for several life sciences enterprises in Central Europe. Euvic: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 2 billion (est.) Number of employees: 5000+ Website: www.euvic.com Headquarters: Gliwice, Poland Main services / focus: Custom software & integration, cloud services, AI & data analytics, IT outsourcing, consulting 6. Billennium Billennium is a Poland-based IT services company known for its strong partnerships with global pharma and biotech clients. Established in 2003, Billennium has expanded worldwide (nearly 1,800 employees across Europe, Asia, and North America) and achieved record revenues of PLN 351 million in 2022 (with continued growth through 2024). In the pharmaceutical arena, Billennium provides teams and solutions for enterprise application development, cloud transformation, and AI implementations. The company has helped pharma organizations modernize core systems (for example, deploying Salesforce-based platforms for customer management), and it offers validated software development aligned with GMP/GAMP5 quality standards. With expertise in cloud (Microsoft Azure, AWS) and data analytics, Billennium ensures pharma clients can leverage emerging technologies while maintaining compliance. Its mix of expert IT staffing and managed services makes Billennium a flexible partner for both short-term projects and long-term digital initiatives in life sciences. Billennium: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 400 million (est.) Number of employees: 1800+ Website: www.billennium.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: IT outsourcing & team leasing, cloud solutions (Microsoft, AWS), custom software development, AI & data, Salesforce solutions 7. Netguru Netguru is a prominent Polish software development and consultancy company, acclaimed for building cutting-edge digital products. Headquartered in Poznań and operating globally, Netguru has around 600+ experts in web and mobile development, UX/UI design, and strategy. While Netguru’s portfolio spans many industries, it has delivered innovative solutions in healthcare and pharma as well – such as patient-facing mobile apps, telehealth platforms, and internal tools for pharma sales teams. Netguru’s agile approach and focus on user-centric design help pharma clients create engaging applications (for patients, doctors, or field reps) that are also secure and compliant. With ~PLN 300 million in annual revenue (2022) and recognition as one of Europe’s fastest-growing companies, Netguru combines startup-like innovation with enterprise-level reliability. Pharma companies turn to Netguru to accelerate their digital transformation initiatives – whether it’s prototyping an AI-powered health app or scaling up an existing platform to global markets. Netguru: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 300 million (est.) Number of employees: 600+ Website: www.netguru.com Headquarters: Poznań, Poland Main services / focus: Custom software & app development, UX/UI design, digital product strategy, mobile and web solutions, innovation consulting 8. Lingaro Lingaro is a Polish-born data analytics powerhouse that has made its mark delivering business intelligence and data engineering solutions. Founded in Warsaw, Lingaro grew to over 1,300 employees and an estimated PLN 500 million in 2024 revenue by serving Fortune 500 clients. In pharma, where data-driven decisions are critical (from R&D analytics to supply chain optimization), Lingaro provides end-to-end services: data warehouse development, big data platform integration, advanced analytics, and AI/ML solutions. They have built analytics dashboards for pharmaceutical sales and marketing, implemented data lakes to consolidate research data, and ensured compliance with GDPR and HIPAA in data handling. Lingaro’s strength lies in merging technical prowess (across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud) with a deep understanding of data governance. For pharma companies aiming to become more data-driven and insight-rich, Lingaro offers a proven track record in transforming raw data into actionable intelligence. Lingaro: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 500 million (est.) Number of employees: 1300+ Website: www.lingarogroup.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Data analytics & visualization, data engineering & warehousing, AI/ML solutions, cloud data platforms, analytics consulting 9. ITMAGINATION ITMAGINATION is a Warsaw-based IT consulting and software development firm known for accelerating innovation in enterprises. With around 400+ professionals, ITMAGINATION has served clients in banking, telecom, and also collaborated with pharmaceutical corporations on digital initiatives. The company offers custom development, data analytics, and cloud services – for example, building data platforms that unify clinical and operational data, or developing custom software to automate specific pharma workflows. ITMAGINATION’s expertise in Microsoft technologies (Azure cloud, Power BI, .NET) and agile delivery make it well-suited for pharma projects that require quick turnaround and strict quality control. In recent years, ITMAGINATION has also focused on AI solutions and machine learning, which can be applied to pharma use cases like predictive analytics for patient adherence or drug supply optimization. Now part of a larger global group (via acquisition by Virtusa in 2023), ITMAGINATION combines Polish tech talent with international reach, benefitting pharma clients with scalable delivery and domain know-how. ITMAGINATION: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 150 million (est.) Number of employees: 400+ Website: www.itmagination.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Custom software development, data & BI solutions, Azure cloud services, IT consulting, staff augmentation 10. Ardigen Ardigen is a specialist IT company at the intersection of biotechnology and software, making it a unique player in this list. Based in Kraków, Poland, Ardigen focuses on AI-driven drug discovery and bioinformatics solutions for pharma and biotech clients worldwide. Its team of around 150 bioinformatics engineers, data scientists, and software developers builds platforms that accelerate R&D – such as AI models for identifying drug candidates, machine learning tools for personalized medicine, and advanced software for analyzing genomic data. Ardigen’s deep domain expertise in areas like immunology and molecular biology sets it apart: it understands the science behind pharma, not just the code. For pharmaceutical companies looking to leverage artificial intelligence in research or to implement complex algorithms (while navigating compliance with new EU AI regulations and GMP standards), Ardigen is a go-to partner. The company’s rapid growth and cutting-edge projects (often in collaboration with top global pharma firms) highlight Poland’s contribution to innovation in life sciences IT. Ardigen: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 50 million (est.) Number of employees: 150+ Website: www.ardigen.com Headquarters: Kraków, Poland Main services / focus: AI/ML in drug discovery, bioinformatics, data science, precision medicine software, digital biotech solutions Why Choose Polish IT Companies for Pharma Polish IT companies have built a strong reputation for combining technical expertise with cost efficiency, making them attractive partners for global pharma organizations. The country offers a large pool of highly educated specialists who are experienced in working under strict EU and FDA regulations. Many Polish providers also invest heavily in R&D and AI, ensuring access to the latest innovations in data analytics, clinical platforms, and digital health. Their proximity to major European markets guarantees smooth communication and alignment with regulatory frameworks. This unique mix of skills, compliance, and innovation positions Poland as a reliable hub for pharma technology services. Key Factors When Selecting a Pharma IT Partner Selecting the right IT vendor for pharma requires careful consideration of both technical and regulatory capabilities. Beyond standard expertise in software development, providers must demonstrate experience with GxP, GMP, and GDPR compliance. It is also critical to assess their track record in delivering validated systems and managing sensitive patient or clinical data securely. Decision-makers should evaluate whether the partner offers scalable solutions, such as cloud and AI, that can adapt to future needs. Finally, strong communication, transparent project management, and industry references are essential to ensuring long-term success in pharma IT projects. Leverage TTMS for Pharma IT Success – Our Experience in Action Choosing the right technology partner is crucial for pharmaceutical companies to innovate safely and efficiently. Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) offers the full spectrum of IT services tailored to the pharma sector, backed by a rich portfolio of successful projects. We invite you to explore some of our impactful case studies – each demonstrating TTMS’s ability to solve complex pharma challenges with technology. Below are our latest case studies showing how we support global clients in transforming their business: Chronic Disease Management System – A digital therapeutics solution for diabetes care, integrating insulin pumps and glucose sensors to improve adherence. Business Analytics and Optimization – Data-driven insights enabling pharmaceutical organizations to optimize performance and enhance decision-making. Vendor Management System for Healthcare – Streamlining contractor and vendor processes in pharma to ensure compliance and efficiency. Patient Portal (PingOne + Adobe AEM) – A secure and high-performance patient platform with integrated single sign-on for safe access. Automated Workforce Management – Replacing spreadsheets with an integrated system to improve planning and save costs. Supply Chain Cost Management – Enhancing transparency and control over supply chain costs in the pharma industry. Customized Finance Management System – Building a tailor-made finance platform to meet the specific needs of a global enterprise. Reporting and Data Analysis Efficiency – Improving reporting speed and quality with advanced analytics tools. SAP CIAM Implementation for Healthcare – Delivering secure identity and access management for a healthcare provider. Each of these examples showcases TTMS’s commitment to quality, innovation, and understanding of pharma regulations. Whether you need to modernize legacy systems, harness AI for research, or ensure compliance across your IT landscape – our team is ready to help your pharmaceutical business thrive in the digital age. Contact us to discuss how we can support your goals with proven expertise and tailor-made solutions. How do IT vendors support regulatory inspections in the pharma sector? IT vendors experienced in pharma often build solutions with audit trails, automated reporting, and strict access control that make regulatory inspections smoother. They also provide documentation aligned with GMP and GAMP5 standards, which inspectors typically require. Some vendors offer validation packages that demonstrate compliance from day one. This not only reduces inspection risks but also saves valuable time during audits. Ultimately, an IT partner becomes part of the compliance ecosystem rather than just a technology supplier. Can Polish IT providers help reduce the time-to-market for new drugs? Yes, Polish IT providers frequently implement AI and automation to speed up processes like clinical trial management, data analysis, and patient recruitment. Faster and more reliable data handling allows pharma companies to make informed decisions more quickly. These efficiencies shorten the development timeline and can lead to earlier regulatory submissions. In some cases, innovative platforms built in Poland have cut months from the R&D cycle. This ability to accelerate time-to-market is one of the biggest advantages of working with a tech-savvy partner. What role does data security play in choosing a pharma IT partner? Data security is paramount in pharma because of the sensitivity of patient information and clinical data. A reliable vendor must follow strict cybersecurity protocols, encryption standards, and comply with GDPR and HIPAA. Many Polish providers invest in secure data centers and cloud platforms certified by global standards. They also implement monitoring and anomaly detection systems to prevent breaches. Companies that prioritize data security not only protect patient trust but also safeguard the company’s reputation. How do cultural and geographic factors influence collaboration with Polish IT firms? Poland’s central location in Europe ensures overlapping working hours with both Western Europe and North America, which improves communication. Cultural proximity and strong English proficiency make collaboration smoother than with many offshore destinations. Additionally, Polish teams often adopt agile methodologies that encourage transparency and regular feedback. This makes cooperation with global pharma firms efficient and predictable. Such cultural and geographic alignment is a hidden but powerful advantage when selecting a vendor. Are Polish IT providers active in emerging areas like digital therapeutics and AI in drug discovery? Absolutely, many Polish IT companies are pioneers in digital therapeutics, mobile health apps, and AI solutions tailored for drug discovery. They collaborate closely with research organizations and biotech startups, bringing innovation directly into pharma pipelines. For example, AI algorithms can help identify promising compounds or predict patient responses. Digital therapeutics developed by Polish teams support patient engagement and improve adherence to treatment. This forward-looking expertise ensures pharma companies are prepared for the future of medicine.

Read

2…28

TOP 10 AEM partners in 2025

Microsoft’s In-House AI Move: MAI-1 and MAI-Voice-1 Signal a Shift from OpenAI

TOP 7 AI Solutions Delivery Companies in 2025

Deepfake Detection Breakthrough: Universal Detector Achieves 98% Accuracy

ChatGPT 5 Modes: Auto, Fast (Instant), Thinking, Pro – Which Mode to Use and Why?

Top 10 Polish IT Providers for the Pharma Sector in 2025