ChatGPT 5 Modes: Auto, Fast (Instant), Thinking, Pro – Which Mode to Use and Why?
Unlocking ChatGPT 5 Modes: How Auto, Fast, Thinking, and Pro Really Work Most of us use ChatGPT on autopilot – we type a question and wait for the AI to answer, without ever wondering if there are different modes to choose from. Yet these modes do exist, though they’re a bit tucked away in the interface and less visible than they once were. You can find them in the model picker, usually under options like Auto, Fast, Thinking, or Pro, and they each change how the AI works. But is it really worth exploring them? And how do they impact speed, accuracy, and even cost? That’s exactly what we’ll uncover in this article. ChatGPT 5 introduces several modes of operation – Auto, Fast (sometimes called Instant), Thinking, and Pro – as well as access to older model versions. If you’re wondering what each of these modes does, when to switch between them (if at all), and how they differ in speed, quality, and cost, this comprehensive guide will clarify everything. We’ll also discuss which modes are best suited for everyday users versus business or professional users. Each mode in GPT-5 is designed for a different balance of speed and reasoning depth. Below, we answer the key questions about these modes in an SEO-friendly Q&A format, so you can quickly find the information you need. 1. What are the new modes in ChatGPT 5 and why do they exist? ChatGPT 5 (GPT-5) has transformed the old model selection into a unified system with four mode options: Auto, Fast, Thinking, and Pro. These modes exist to let the AI adjust how much “thinking” (computational effort and reasoning time) it should use for a given query: Auto Mode: This is the default unified mode. GPT-5 automatically decides whether to respond quickly or engage deeper reasoning based on your question’s complexity. Fast Mode: A mode for instant answers – GPT-5 responds very quickly with minimal extra reasoning. (This is essentially GPT-5’s standard mode for everyday queries.) Thinking Mode: A deep reasoning mode – GPT-5 will take longer to formulate an answer, performing more analysis and step-by-step reasoning for complex tasks. Pro Mode: A “research-grade” mode – the most advanced and thorough option. GPT-5 will use maximum computing power (even running parts of the task in parallel) to produce the most accurate and detailed answer possible. These modes were introduced because GPT-5 is capable of dynamically adjusting its reasoning. In previous versions like GPT-4, users had to manually pick between different models (e.g. standard vs. advanced reasoning models). Now GPT-5 consolidates that into one system with modes, making it easier to get the right balance of speed vs. depth without constantly switching models. The Auto mode in particular means most users can just ask questions normally and let ChatGPT decide if a quick answer will do or if it should “think longer” for a better result. 2. How does ChatGPT 5’s Auto mode work? The Auto mode is the intelligent default that makes GPT-5 decide on the fly how much reasoning is needed. When you have GPT-5 set to Auto, it will typically answer straightforward questions using the Fast approach for speed. If you ask a more complex or multi-step question, the system can automatically invoke the Thinking mode behind the scenes to give a more carefully reasoned answer. In practice, Auto mode means you don’t have to manually select a model for most situations. GPT-5’s internal “router” analyzes your prompt and chooses the appropriate strategy: For a simple prompt (like “Summarize this paragraph” or “What’s the capital of France?”), GPT-5 will likely respond almost immediately (using the Fast response mode). For a complex prompt (like “Analyze this financial report and give insights” or a tricky coding/debugging question), GPT-5 may “think” for a bit longer before answering. You might notice a brief indication that it’s reasoning more deeply. This is GPT-5 automatically switching into its Thinking mode to ensure it works through the problem. Auto mode is ideal for most users because it delivers the best of both worlds: quick answers when possible, and more thorough answers when necessary. You can always override it by manually picking Fast or Thinking, but Auto means less guesswork – the AI itself decides how long to think. If you ever explicitly want it to take its time, you can even tell GPT-5 in your prompt to “think carefully about this,” which encourages the system to engage deeper reasoning. Tip: When GPT-5 Auto decides to think longer, the interface will indicate it. You usually have an option to “Get a quick answer” if you don’t want to wait for the full reasoning. This allows you to interrupt the deep thinking and force a faster (but potentially less detailed) reply, giving you control even in Auto mode. 3. What is the Fast (Instant) mode in GPT-5 used for? The Fast mode (labeled “Fast – instant answers” in the ChatGPT model picker) is designed for speedy responses. In Fast mode, GPT-5 will generate an answer as quickly as possible without dedicating extra time to extensive reasoning. Essentially, this is GPT-5’s standard mode for everyday tasks that don’t require heavy analysis. When to use Fast mode: Simple or routine queries: If you’re asking something straightforward (factual questions, brief explanations, casual conversation), Fast mode will give you an answer within a few seconds. Brainstorming and creative prompts: Need a quick list of ideas or a first draft of a tweet/blog? Fast mode is usually sufficient and time-efficient. General coding help: For small coding questions or debugging minor errors, Fast mode can provide answers quickly. GPT-5’s base capability is already high, so for many coding tasks you might not need the extra reasoning. Everyday business tasks: Writing an email, summarizing a document, responding to a common customer query – Fast mode handles these with speed and improved accuracy (GPT-5 is noted to have fewer random mistakes than GPT-4 did, even in its fast responses). In Fast mode, GPT-5 is still quite powerful and more reliable than older GPT-4 models for common tasks. It’s also cost-efficient (lower compute usage means fewer tokens consumed, which matters if you have usage limits or are paying per token via the API). The trade-off is that it might not catch extremely subtle details or perform multi-step reasoning as well as the Thinking mode would. However, for the vast majority of prompts that are not highly complex, Fast mode’s answers are both quick and accurate. This is why Fast (or “Standard”) mode serves as the backbone for day-to-day interactions with ChatGPT 5. 4. When should you use the GPT-5 Thinking mode? GPT-5’s Thinking mode is meant for situations where you need extra accuracy, depth, or complex problem-solving. When you manually switch to Thinking mode, ChatGPT will deliberately take more time (and tokens) to work through your query step by step, almost like an expert “thinking out loud” internally before giving you a result. You should use Thinking mode for tasks where a quick off-the-cuff answer might not be good enough. Use GPT-5 Thinking mode when: The problem is complex or multi-step: If you ask a tough math word problem, a complex programming challenge, or an analytical question (e.g. “What are the implications of this scientific study’s results?”), Thinking mode will yield a more structured and correct solution. It’s designed to handle advanced reasoning tasks like these with higher accuracy. Precision matters: For example, drafting a legal clause, analyzing financial data for trends, or writing a medical report summary. In such cases, mistakes can be costly, so you want the AI to be as careful as possible. Thinking mode reduces the chance of errors and hallucinations even further by allocating more computation to verify facts and logic. Technical or detailed writing: If you need longer, well-thought-out content – such as an in-depth explanation of a concept, thorough documentation, or a step-by-step guide – the Thinking mode can produce a more comprehensive answer. It’s like giving the model extra time to gather its thoughts and double-check itself before responding. Coding complex projects: For debugging a large codebase, solving a tricky algorithm, or generating non-trivial code (like a full module or a complex function), Thinking mode performs significantly better. It’s been observed to greatly improve coding accuracy and can handle more elaborate tasks like multi-language code coordination or intricate logic that Fast mode might get wrong. Trade-offs: In Thinking mode, responses are slower. You might wait somewhere on the order of 10-30 seconds (depending on the complexity of your request) for an answer, instead of the usual 2-5 seconds in Fast mode. It also uses more tokens and computing resources, meaning it’s more expensive to run. If you’re on ChatGPT Plus, there are even usage limits for how many Thinking-mode messages you can send per week (because each such response is heavy on the system). However, those downsides are often justified when the question is important enough. The mode can deliver dramatically improved accuracy – for example, internal OpenAI benchmarks showed huge jumps in performance (several-fold improvements on certain expert tasks) when GPT-5 is allowed to think longer. In summary, switch to Thinking mode for high-stakes or highly complex prompts where you want the best possible answer and you’re willing to wait a bit longer for it. For everyday quick queries, it’s not necessary – the default fast responses will do. Many Plus users might use Thinking mode sparingly for those tough questions, while relying on Auto/Fast for everything else. 5. What does GPT-5 Pro mode offer, and who really needs it? GPT-5 Pro mode is the most advanced and resource-intensive mode available in ChatGPT 5. It’s often described as “research-grade intelligence.” This mode is only available to users on the highest-tier plans (ChatGPT Pro or ChatGPT Business plans) and is intended for enterprise-level or critical tasks that demand maximum accuracy and thoroughness. Here’s what Pro mode offers and who benefits from it: Maximum accuracy through parallel reasoning: GPT-5 Pro doesn’t just think longer; it also can think more broadly. Under the hood, Pro mode can run multiple reasoning threads in parallel (imagine consulting an entire panel of AI experts simultaneously) and then synthesize the best answer. This leads to even more refined responses with fewer mistakes. In testing, GPT-5 Pro set new records on difficult academic and professional benchmarks, outperforming the standard Thinking mode in many cases. Use cases for Pro: This mode shines in high-stakes, mission-critical scenarios: Scientific research and healthcare: e.g. analyzing complex biomedical data, discovering drug candidates, or interpreting medical imaging results (where absolute precision is vital). Finance and legal: e.g. risk modeling, auditing complex financial portfolios, generating or reviewing legal contracts with extreme accuracy – tasks where an error could cost a lot of money or have legal implications. Large-scale enterprise analytics: e.g. processing lengthy confidential reports, performing deep market analysis, or powering a virtual assistant that needs to reliably handle very complex queries from users. AI development: If you’re a developer building AI-driven applications (like agents that plan and act autonomously), GPT-5 Pro provides the most consistent reasoning depth and reliability for those advanced applications. Who needs Pro: Generally, businesses and professionals with intensive needs. For a casual user or even most power-users, the standard GPT-5 (and occasional Thinking mode) is usually enough. Pro mode is targeted at enterprise users, research institutions, or AI enthusiasts who require that extra edge in performance – and are willing to pay a premium for it. Drawbacks of Pro mode: The word “Pro” implies it’s not for everyone. First, it’s expensive – both in terms of subscription cost and computational cost. As of 2025, ChatGPT Pro subscriptions run at a much higher price (around $200 per month) compared to the standard Plus plan, and that buys you the privilege of using this powerful mode without the normal usage caps. Also, each Pro mode response consumes a lot of compute (and tokens), so from an API or cost perspective it’s the priciest option (roughly double the token cost of Thinking mode, and ~10 times the cost of a quick response). Second, speed: Pro mode is the slowest to respond. Because it’s doing so much work under the hood, you might wait 20-40 seconds or more for a single answer. In interactive chat, that can feel lengthy. Lastly, Pro mode currently has a couple of limitations in features (for instance, certain ChatGPT tools like image generation or the canvas feature may not be enabled with GPT-5 Pro, due to its specialized nature). Bottom line: GPT-5 Pro is a potent tool if you truly need the highest level of AI reasoning and are in an environment where accuracy outweighs all other concerns (and cost is justified by the value of the results). It’s likely overkill for everyday needs. Most users, even many developers, won’t need Pro mode regularly. It’s more for organizations or individuals tackling problems where that extra 5-10% improvement in quality is worth the extra expense and time. 6. How do the modes differ in speed and answer quality? Each mode in ChatGPT 5 strikes a different balance between speed and the depth/quality of the answer: Fast mode is the quickest: It typically responds within a couple of seconds for a prompt. The answers are high-quality for normal questions (much better than older GPT-3.5 or even GPT-4 in many cases), but Fast mode will not always catch very subtle nuances or deeply reason through complicated instructions. Think of Fast mode answers as “good enough and very fast” for general purposes. Thinking mode is slower but more thorough: When GPT-5 Thinking is engaged, response times slow down (often 10-30 seconds depending on complexity). The quality of the answers, however, is more robust and detailed. GPT-5 Thinking will handle multi-step reasoning tasks significantly better. For example, if a Fast mode answer might occasionally miscalculate or simplify a complex answer, the Thinking mode is far more likely to get it correct and provide justification or step-by-step details in its response. In terms of quality, you can expect far fewer factual errors or “hallucinations” in Thinking mode responses, since the AI took extra time to verify and cross-check its answer internally. Pro mode is the most meticulous (and slowest): GPT-5 Pro will take even more time than Thinking mode for a response, as it uses maximum compute. It might explore several potential solutions internally before finalizing an answer, which maximizes the quality and correctness. The answers from Pro mode are usually the most detailed, well-structured, and accurate. You might notice they contain deeper insights or handle edge cases that the other modes might miss. The trade-off is that Pro mode responses can easily take half a minute or more, and you wouldn’t use it unless you truly need that level of depth. In summary: Speed: Fast > Thinking > Pro (Fast is fastest, Pro is slowest). Answer depth/quality: Pro > Thinking > Fast (Pro gives the most advanced answers, Fast gives concise answers). Everyday effectiveness: For most simple queries, all modes will do fine; you won’t necessarily notice a quality difference on an easy question. The differences become apparent on challenging tasks. Fast mode might give a decent but not perfect answer, Thinking mode will give a correct and well-explained answer, and Pro mode will give an exceptionally detailed answer with minimal chance of error. It’s also worth noting that GPT-5’s base quality (even in Fast mode) is a leap over previous generations. Many users find that even quick answers from GPT-5 are more accurate and nuanced than what GPT-4 produced. So speed doesn’t degrade quality as much as you might think for typical questions – it mainly matters when the question is particularly difficult. 7. Do different GPT-5 modes use more tokens or cost more to use? Yes, the modes do differ in terms of token usage and cost, though it might not be obvious at first glance. The general rule is: the more thinking a mode does, the more tokens and cost it will incur. Here’s how it breaks down: Fast mode (Standard GPT-5): This mode is the most token-efficient. It generates answers quickly without a lot of internal computation, so it tends to use only the tokens needed for the answer itself. If you’re using the ChatGPT subscription, there’s no direct “cost” per message beyond your subscription, but Fast mode also consumes your message quota more slowly (because each answer is concise and doesn’t involve hidden extra tokens). If you were using the API, Fast mode’s underlying model has the lowest price per 1000 tokens (OpenAI has indicated something on the order of $0.002 per 1K tokens for GPT-5 Standard, which is even a bit cheaper than GPT-4 was). Thinking mode: This mode is resource-intensive, meaning it will use more tokens internally to reason through the problem. When GPT-5 “thinks,” it might be effectively doing multi-step reasoning which uses up extra tokens behind the scenes (these don’t all show up in the answer, but they count towards computation). The cost per token for this mode is higher (roughly 5× the cost of standard mode on the API side). In ChatGPT Plus, using Thinking mode too often is limited – for instance, Plus users can only initiate a certain number of Thinking-mode messages per week (because each one is expensive to run on the server). So effectively, each Thinking response “costs” much more in terms of your usage allowance. In practical terms, expect that a deep Thinking answer might consume significantly more of your message limits than a quick answer would. Pro mode: Pro mode is the most expensive per use. It not only carries a higher token cost (approximately double that of Thinking mode per token, or about 10× the base cost of Fast mode), but it often produces longer answers and does a lot of work internally. This is why Pro mode is reserved for the highest-paying tier – it would be infeasible to offer unlimited Pro responses at a low price point. If you have a Pro subscription or enterprise access, you effectively have no hard limit on GPT-5 usage, but your cost is the hefty monthly fee instead. If you were using an API equivalent, Pro mode would be quite costly per 1000 tokens. The benefit is that because Pro is so accurate, in theory you might save money by not having to repeat queries or fix mistakes – but you’d only worry about that if you’re using GPT-5 for high-value tasks. In terms of token usage in answers, deeper modes often yield longer, more detailed replies (especially if the task warrants it). That means more output tokens. Also, they reduce the chance you’ll need to ask follow-up questions or clarifications (which themselves would consume more tokens), which is another way they can be “cost-effective” despite higher per-message cost. But if you’re on the free plan or Plus, the main thing to know is that the heavy modes will hit your usage limits faster: Free users only get a very limited number of GPT-5 messages and just 1 Thinking-mode use per day on free tier. This is because Thinking uses a lot of resources. Plus users get more (currently around 160 messages per 3 hours for GPT-5, and up to 3,000 Thinking messages per week maximum). If a Plus user sticks to Fast/Auto primarily, they can get a lot of answers within those caps; if they use Thinking for every query, they’ll hit weekly limits much sooner. Pro/Business users have “unlimited” use, but that comes at the high subscription cost. So, in conclusion, each mode does “cost” differently: Fast mode is cheapest and most token-efficient, Thinking mode costs several times more per question, and Pro is premium priced. If you’re concerned about token usage (say, for API billing or hitting message caps), use the heavier modes only when needed. Otherwise, the Auto mode will handle it for you, using extra tokens only when it determines the value of a better answer is worth the cost. 8. Should you manually switch modes or let ChatGPT decide automatically? For most users, letting GPT-5 Auto mode handle it is the simplest and often the best approach. The auto-switching system was built to spare you from micromanaging the model’s behavior. By default, GPT-5 will not waste time “overthinking” an easy question, and similarly it won’t give you a shallow answer to a really complex prompt – it will adjust as needed. That said, there are scenarios where manually choosing a mode makes sense: When you know you need a deep analysis: If you’re about to ask something very complex and you want to ensure the highest accuracy (and you have access to Thinking mode), you might manually switch to Thinking mode before asking. This guarantees GPT-5 spends maximum effort, rather than waiting to see if it might decide to do so. For example, a data scientist preparing a detailed report might directly use Thinking mode for each query to get thorough answers. When you’re in a hurry for a simple answer: If GPT-5 (Auto) starts “Thinking…” but you actually just want a quick answer or a brainstorm, you can click “Get a quick answer” or simply switch to Fast mode for that question. Sometimes the AI might be overly cautious and begin deep reasoning when you didn’t need it – in those cases, forcing Fast mode will save you time. When conserving usage: If you’re on a limited plan and near your cap, you might stick to Fast mode to maximize the number of questions you can ask, since Thinking mode would burn through your quota faster. Conversely, if you have plenty of headroom and need a top-notch answer, you can use Thinking mode more liberally. Using Pro mode deliberately: If you’re one of the users with Pro access, you’ll likely switch to Pro mode only for the most critical queries. It doesn’t make sense to use Pro for every single chat message due to the slower speed – better to reserve it for when you have a genuinely high-value question that justifies it. In short, Auto mode is usually sufficient and is the recommended default for both casual and many professional interactions. You only need to manually switch modes in special cases: either to force extra rigor or to force extra speed. Think of manual mode switching as an override for the AI’s decisions. The system’s pretty good at picking the right mode on its own, but you remain in control if you disagree with its choice. 9. Are older models like GPT-4 still available in ChatGPT 5? Yes, older models are still accessible in the ChatGPT interface under a “Legacy models” section – but you may not need to use them often. With the rollout of GPT-5: GPT-4 (often labeled GPT-4o or other variants) is available to paid users as a legacy option. If you have a Plus, Business, or Pro account, you can find GPT-4 in the model picker under legacy models. This is mainly provided for compatibility or specific use cases where someone might want to compare answers or use an older model on prior conversations. Additionally, OpenAI has allowed access to some intermediate models (like GPT-4.1, GPT-4.5, or older 3.5 models often labeled as o3, o4-mini, etc.) for certain subscription tiers, but these are hidden unless you enable “Show additional models” in your settings. Plus users, for example, can see a few of those, while Pro users can see slightly more (like GPT-4.5). By default, if you don’t specifically switch to an older model, all your chats will use GPT-5 (Auto mode). And if you open an old chat that was originally with GPT-4, the system may automatically load it with the GPT-5 equivalent to continue the conversation. So OpenAI has tried to transition seamlessly such that GPT-5 handles most things going forward. Do you need the older models? For the majority of cases, no. GPT-5’s Standard/Fast mode is intended to replace GPT-4 for everyday use, and it’s better at almost everything. There might be a rare instance where an older model had a particular style or a specific capability you want to replicate – then you could switch to it. But generally, GPT-5’s intelligence and the Auto mode’s adaptability mean you won’t often have to manually use GPT-4 or others. In fact, some of the older GPT-4 variants might be slower or have lower context length compared to GPT-5, so unless you have a compatibility reason, it’s best to let GPT-5 take over. One thing to note: if you exceed certain usage limits with GPT-5 (especially on the free tier), ChatGPT will automatically fall back to a “GPT-5 mini” or even GPT-3.5 temporarily until your limit resets. This is done behind the scenes to ensure free users always get some service. In the UI, it might not clearly say it switched, but the quality might differ. Paid users won’t experience this fallback except when they intentionally use legacy models. In summary, older models are there if you need them, but GPT-5’s modes are now the main focus and cover almost all use cases that older models did – typically with better results. 10. Which GPT-5 mode is best for business users versus general users? The choice of mode can depend on who you are and what you’re trying to accomplish. Let’s break it down for individual (general) users and business users or professionals: General Users / Individuals: If you’re an everyday user (for personal projects, learning, or casual use), you’ll likely be perfectly satisfied with the default GPT-5 Auto mode, using Fast responses most of the time and occasionally letting it dip into Thinking mode when you ask a harder question. A ChatGPT Plus subscription might be worthwhile if you use it very frequently, since it gives you more GPT-5 usage and access to manual Thinking mode when you need it. However, you probably do not need GPT-5 Pro mode. The Pro tier is expensive and geared toward unlimited heavy use, which average users don’t usually require. In short, general users should stick with the standard GPT-5 (Auto/Fast) for speed and ease, and use Thinking mode for those few cases where you want a deep dive answer. This will keep your costs low (or your Plus subscription fully sufficient) while still giving you excellent results. Business Users / Professionals: For business purposes, the stakes and scale often increase. If you run a business integrating ChatGPT, or you’re using it in a professional setting (for instance, to assist with your work in finance, law, engineering, customer service, etc.), you need to consider accuracy and reliability carefully: Small Business or Plus for Professionals: Many professional users will find that a Plus account with GPT-5’s Thinking mode available is enough. You can manually invoke Thinking mode for those complex tasks like data analysis or report generation, ensuring high quality when needed, while keeping most interactions quick and efficient in standard mode. This approach is cost-effective and likely sufficient unless your domain is extremely sensitive. Enterprises or High-Stakes Use: If you’re an enterprise user or your work involves critical decision-making (say, a medical AI tool, or a financial firm doing big analyses), GPT-5 Pro might be worth the investment. Businesses benefit from Pro mode’s extra accuracy and from the unlimited usage it offers. There’s no worry about hitting message caps, which is important if you have many employees or customers interacting with the system. Moreover, the larger context window on the Pro plan (GPT-5 Pro supports dramatically bigger inputs, up to 128K tokens context for Fast and ~196K for Thinking, according to OpenAI) allows analysis of very large documents or datasets in one go – a huge plus for enterprise use cases. Cost-Benefit: Businesses should weigh the cost of the Pro subscription (or Business plan) against the value of the improved outputs. If a single mistake avoided by Pro mode could save your company thousands of dollars, then using Pro mode is justified. On the other hand, if your use of AI is more routine (like answering common customer questions or writing marketing content), the standard GPT-5 might already be more than capable, and a Plus plan at a fraction of the cost will do the job. In summary, for general users: stick with Auto/Fast, use Thinking sparingly, and you likely don’t need Pro. For business users: start with GPT-5’s standard and Thinking modes; if you find their limits (in accuracy or usage caps) hindering your mission-critical tasks, then consider upgrading to Pro mode. GPT-5 Pro is predominantly aimed at businesses, research labs, and power users who truly need that unparalleled performance and can justify the expense. Everyone else will find GPT-5’s default modes already a significant upgrade that addresses both casual and moderately complex needs effectively. 11. Final Thoughts: Getting the Most Out of ChatGPT 5’s Modes ChatGPT 5’s new modes – Auto, Fast, Thinking, and Pro – give you a flexible toolkit to get the exact type of answer you need, when you need it. For most people, letting Auto mode handle things is easiest, ensuring you get fast responses for simple questions and deeper analysis for tough ones without manual effort. The system is designed to optimize speed and intelligence automatically. However, it’s great that you have the freedom to choose: if you ever feel a response needs to be more immediate or more thorough, you can toggle to the corresponding mode. Keep an eye on how each mode performs for your use case: Use Fast mode for quick, on-the-fly Q&A and save precious time. Invoke Thinking mode for those problems where you’d rather wait a few extra seconds and be confident in the answer’s accuracy and detail. Reserve Pro mode for the rare instances where only the best will do (and if your resources allow for it). Remember, all GPT-5 modes leverage the same underlying advancements that make this model more capable than its predecessors: improved factual accuracy, better following of instructions, and more context capacity. Whether you’re a curious individual user or a business deploying AI at scale, understanding these modes will help you harness GPT-5 effectively while managing speed, quality, and cost according to your needs. Happy chatting with GPT-5! 12. Want More Than Chat Modes? Discover Bespoke AI Services from TTMS ChatGPT is powerful, but sometimes you need more than a mode toggle – you need custom AI solutions built for your business. That’s where TTMS comes in. We offer tailored services that go beyond what any off-the-shelf mode can do: AI Solutions for Business – end-to-end AI integration to automate workflows and unlock operational efficiency. (See https://ttms.com/ai-solutions-for-business/) Anti-Money Laundering Software Solutions – AI-powered AML systems that help meet regulatory compliance with precision and speed. (See https://ttms.com/anti-money-laundry-software-solutions/) AI4Legal – legal-tech tools using AI to support contract drafting, review, and risk analysis. (See https://ttms.com/ai4legal/) AI Document Analysis Tool – extract, validate, and summarize information from documents automatically and reliably. (See https://ttms.com/ai-document-analysis-tool/) AI-E-Learning Authoring Tool – build intelligent training and learning modules that adapt and scale. (See https://ttms.com/ai-e-learning-authoring-tool/) AI-Based Knowledge Management System – structure and retrieve organizational knowledge in smarter, faster ways. (See https://ttms.com/ai-based-knowledge-management-system/) AI Content Localization Services – localize content across languages and cultures, using AI to maintain nuance and consistency. (See https://ttms.com/ai-content-localization-services/) If your goals include saving time, reducing costs, and having AI work for you rather than just alongside you, let’s talk. TTMS crafts AI tools not just for “general mode” but for your exact use case – so you get speed when you need speed, and depth when you need rigor. Does switching between ChatGPT modes change the creativity of answers? Yes, the choice of mode can influence how creative or structured the output feels. In Fast mode, responses are more direct and efficient, which is useful for brainstorming short lists of ideas or generating quick drafts. Thinking mode, on the other hand, allows ChatGPT to explore more options and refine its reasoning, which often leads to more original or nuanced results in storytelling, marketing, or creative writing. Pro mode takes this even further, producing well-polished, highly detailed content, but it comes with longer wait times and higher costs. Which ChatGPT mode is most reliable for coding? For simple coding tasks such as generating small functions, fixing syntax errors, or writing snippets, Fast mode usually performs well and delivers answers quickly. However, when working on complex projects that involve debugging large codebases, designing algorithms, or ensuring higher reliability, Thinking mode is a better choice. Pro mode is reserved for scenarios where absolute precision matters, such as enterprise-level software or mission-critical applications. In short: use Fast for convenience, Thinking for accuracy, and Pro only when failure isn’t an option. Do ChatGPT modes affect memory or context length? The modes themselves don’t directly change the memory of your conversation or the context size. All GPT-5 modes share the same underlying architecture, but the subscription tier determines the maximum context length available. For example, Pro plans unlock significantly larger context windows, which makes it possible to analyze or generate content across hundreds of pages of text. So while Fast, Thinking, and Pro modes behave differently in terms of reasoning depth, the real impact on memory and context length comes from the plan you are using rather than the mode itself. Can free users access all ChatGPT modes? No, free users have very limited access. Typically, the free tier allows only Fast (Auto) mode, with an occasional option to test Thinking mode under strict daily limits. Access to Pro mode is reserved exclusively for paid subscribers on the highest tier. Plus subscribers can use Auto and Thinking regularly, but only Business or Pro users have unrestricted access to the full range of modes. This limitation is due to the high computational costs associated with Thinking and Pro modes. Is there a risk in always using Pro mode? The main “risk” of using Pro mode is not about accuracy, but about practicality. Pro mode delivers the most thorough and precise results, but it is also the slowest and the most expensive option. If you rely on it for every single question, you may find that you’re spending more time and resources than necessary for simple tasks that Fast or Thinking could easily handle. For most users, Pro should be reserved for the toughest or most critical challenges. Otherwise, it’s more efficient to let Auto mode decide or to use Fast for everyday queries. Does ChatGPT switch modes automatically, or do I need to do it manually? ChatGPT 5 offers both options. In Auto mode, the system decides automatically whether a quick response is enough or if it should engage in deeper reasoning. That means you don’t need to worry about switching manually – the AI adjusts to the complexity of your query on its own. However, if you prefer full control, you can always manually select Fast, Thinking, or Pro in the model picker. In practice, Auto is recommended for everyday use, while manual switching makes sense if you explicitly want either maximum speed or maximum accuracy.
Read
Top 10 Polish IT Providers for the Pharma Sector in 2025
Top 10 IT Companies in Poland Serving the Pharmaceutical Industry (2025 Ranking) The pharmaceutical industry relies on advanced IT solutions – from clinical data management and AI-driven drug discovery to secure patient portals and regulatory compliance systems. Poland’s tech sector hosts a range of providers experienced in delivering these solutions for pharma companies. Below is a ranking of the Top 10 Polish IT service providers for the pharma sector in 2025. These companies combine technical excellence with domain knowledge in life sciences, helping pharma organizations innovate while meeting strict regulations. Each entry includes key facts like 2024 revenue and workforce size, as well as main service areas. 1. Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) TTMS leads the pack as a Poland-headquartered IT partner with deep expertise in pharmaceutical projects. Operating since 2015, TTMS has grown rapidly by delivering scalable, high-quality software and managed IT services for regulated industries. The company’s 800+ specialists support global pharma clients in areas ranging from clinical trial management systems to validated cloud platforms. TTMS stands out for its AI-driven solutions – for example, implementing artificial intelligence to automate tender analysis and improve drug development pipelines. As a certified partner of Microsoft, Adobe, Salesforce, and more, TTMS offers end-to-end support, from quality management and computer system validation to custom application development. Its strong pharma portfolio (including case studies in AI for R&D and digital engagement) underscores TTMS’s ability to combine innovation with compliance. TTMS: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 233.7 million Number of employees: 800+ Website: https://ttms.com/pharma-software-development-services/ Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: AEM, Azure, Power Apps, Salesforce, BI, AI, Webcon, e-learning, Quality Management 2. Sii Poland Sii Poland is the country’s largest IT outsourcing and engineering company, with a substantial track record in the pharma domain. Founded in 2006, Sii has over 7,700 professionals and offers broad expertise – from software development and testing to infrastructure management and business process outsourcing. Its teams have supported pharmaceutical clients by developing laboratory information systems, validating applications for FDA compliance, and providing IT specialists (e.g. data analysts, QA engineers) under flexible outsourcing models. With 16 offices across Poland and a reputation for quality delivery, Sii can execute large-scale pharma IT projects while ensuring GxP standards and data security are met. Sii Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 2.13 billion Number of employees: 7700+ Website: www.sii.pl Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: IT outsourcing, engineering, software development, BPO, testing, infrastructure services 3. Asseco Poland Asseco Poland is the largest Polish-owned IT group and a powerhouse in delivering technology to regulated sectors. With origins dating back to 1991, Asseco today operates in over 60 countries (33,000+ staff globally) and reported PLN 17.1 billion in 2024 revenue (group level). In the pharmaceutical field, Asseco leverages its experience in enterprise software to offer validated IT systems, data integration, and software outsourcing services. The company’s portfolio includes healthcare and life-sciences solutions – from hospital and laboratory systems to drug distribution platforms – ensuring interoperability and compliance with EU and FDA regulations. Asseco’s deep R&D capabilities and local presence (headquartered in Rzeszów with major offices across Poland) make it a trusted partner for pharma companies seeking long-term, reliable IT development and support. Asseco Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 17.1 billion (group) Number of employees: 33,000+ (global) Website: pl.asseco.com Headquarters: Rzeszów, Poland Main services / focus: Proprietary software products, custom system development, IT outsourcing, digital government solutions, life sciences IT 4. Comarch Comarch, founded in 1993, is a leading Polish IT provider with a strong footprint in healthcare and industry. With 6,500+ employees and 20+ offices in Poland, Comarch blends product development with IT services. In the pharma and medtech sector, Comarch’s Healthcare division offers solutions like electronic health record platforms, remote patient monitoring, and telemedicine systems – all crucial for pharma companies engaged in clinical research or patient support programs. Comarch also provides custom software development, integration, and IT outsourcing services, tailoring its broad portfolio (ERP, CRM, business intelligence, IoT) to the needs of pharmaceutical clients. Known for robust R&D and secure infrastructure (including its own data centers), Comarch helps pharma firms improve operational efficiency and data-driven decision making. Comarch: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 1.916 billion Number of employees: 6500+ Website: www.comarch.com Headquarters: Kraków, Poland Main services / focus: Healthcare IT (EHR, telemedicine), ERP & CRM systems, custom software development, cloud services, IoT solutions 5. Euvic Euvic is a fast-growing Polish IT group that has become a major player through the federation of dozens of tech companies. With around 5,000 IT specialists and an estimated PLN 2 billion in annual revenue, Euvic delivers a wide spectrum of IT services. For pharmaceutical clients, Euvic’s team offers everything from custom application development and integration (e.g. R&D data platforms, CRM for pharma sales) to analytics and cloud infrastructure management. The group’s decentralized structure allows it to tap specialized skills (AI, data science, mobile, etc.) across its subsidiaries. This means a pharma company can find in Euvic a one-stop partner for digital transformation – whether implementing a secure patient mobile app, automating supply chain processes, or migrating legacy systems to the cloud. Euvic’s scale and flexible engagement models have made it a preferred IT vendor for several life sciences enterprises in Central Europe. Euvic: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 2 billion (est.) Number of employees: 5000+ Website: www.euvic.com Headquarters: Gliwice, Poland Main services / focus: Custom software & integration, cloud services, AI & data analytics, IT outsourcing, consulting 6. Billennium Billennium is a Poland-based IT services company known for its strong partnerships with global pharma and biotech clients. Established in 2003, Billennium has expanded worldwide (nearly 1,800 employees across Europe, Asia, and North America) and achieved record revenues of PLN 351 million in 2022 (with continued growth through 2024). In the pharmaceutical arena, Billennium provides teams and solutions for enterprise application development, cloud transformation, and AI implementations. The company has helped pharma organizations modernize core systems (for example, deploying Salesforce-based platforms for customer management), and it offers validated software development aligned with GMP/GAMP5 quality standards. With expertise in cloud (Microsoft Azure, AWS) and data analytics, Billennium ensures pharma clients can leverage emerging technologies while maintaining compliance. Its mix of expert IT staffing and managed services makes Billennium a flexible partner for both short-term projects and long-term digital initiatives in life sciences. Billennium: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 400 million (est.) Number of employees: 1800+ Website: www.billennium.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: IT outsourcing & team leasing, cloud solutions (Microsoft, AWS), custom software development, AI & data, Salesforce solutions 7. Netguru Netguru is a prominent Polish software development and consultancy company, acclaimed for building cutting-edge digital products. Headquartered in Poznań and operating globally, Netguru has around 600+ experts in web and mobile development, UX/UI design, and strategy. While Netguru’s portfolio spans many industries, it has delivered innovative solutions in healthcare and pharma as well – such as patient-facing mobile apps, telehealth platforms, and internal tools for pharma sales teams. Netguru’s agile approach and focus on user-centric design help pharma clients create engaging applications (for patients, doctors, or field reps) that are also secure and compliant. With ~PLN 300 million in annual revenue (2022) and recognition as one of Europe’s fastest-growing companies, Netguru combines startup-like innovation with enterprise-level reliability. Pharma companies turn to Netguru to accelerate their digital transformation initiatives – whether it’s prototyping an AI-powered health app or scaling up an existing platform to global markets. Netguru: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 300 million (est.) Number of employees: 600+ Website: www.netguru.com Headquarters: Poznań, Poland Main services / focus: Custom software & app development, UX/UI design, digital product strategy, mobile and web solutions, innovation consulting 8. Lingaro Lingaro is a Polish-born data analytics powerhouse that has made its mark delivering business intelligence and data engineering solutions. Founded in Warsaw, Lingaro grew to over 1,300 employees and an estimated PLN 500 million in 2024 revenue by serving Fortune 500 clients. In pharma, where data-driven decisions are critical (from R&D analytics to supply chain optimization), Lingaro provides end-to-end services: data warehouse development, big data platform integration, advanced analytics, and AI/ML solutions. They have built analytics dashboards for pharmaceutical sales and marketing, implemented data lakes to consolidate research data, and ensured compliance with GDPR and HIPAA in data handling. Lingaro’s strength lies in merging technical prowess (across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud) with a deep understanding of data governance. For pharma companies aiming to become more data-driven and insight-rich, Lingaro offers a proven track record in transforming raw data into actionable intelligence. Lingaro: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 500 million (est.) Number of employees: 1300+ Website: www.lingarogroup.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Data analytics & visualization, data engineering & warehousing, AI/ML solutions, cloud data platforms, analytics consulting 9. ITMAGINATION ITMAGINATION is a Warsaw-based IT consulting and software development firm known for accelerating innovation in enterprises. With around 400+ professionals, ITMAGINATION has served clients in banking, telecom, and also collaborated with pharmaceutical corporations on digital initiatives. The company offers custom development, data analytics, and cloud services – for example, building data platforms that unify clinical and operational data, or developing custom software to automate specific pharma workflows. ITMAGINATION’s expertise in Microsoft technologies (Azure cloud, Power BI, .NET) and agile delivery make it well-suited for pharma projects that require quick turnaround and strict quality control. In recent years, ITMAGINATION has also focused on AI solutions and machine learning, which can be applied to pharma use cases like predictive analytics for patient adherence or drug supply optimization. Now part of a larger global group (via acquisition by Virtusa in 2023), ITMAGINATION combines Polish tech talent with international reach, benefitting pharma clients with scalable delivery and domain know-how. ITMAGINATION: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 150 million (est.) Number of employees: 400+ Website: www.itmagination.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Custom software development, data & BI solutions, Azure cloud services, IT consulting, staff augmentation 10. Ardigen Ardigen is a specialist IT company at the intersection of biotechnology and software, making it a unique player in this list. Based in Kraków, Poland, Ardigen focuses on AI-driven drug discovery and bioinformatics solutions for pharma and biotech clients worldwide. Its team of around 150 bioinformatics engineers, data scientists, and software developers builds platforms that accelerate R&D – such as AI models for identifying drug candidates, machine learning tools for personalized medicine, and advanced software for analyzing genomic data. Ardigen’s deep domain expertise in areas like immunology and molecular biology sets it apart: it understands the science behind pharma, not just the code. For pharmaceutical companies looking to leverage artificial intelligence in research or to implement complex algorithms (while navigating compliance with new EU AI regulations and GMP standards), Ardigen is a go-to partner. The company’s rapid growth and cutting-edge projects (often in collaboration with top global pharma firms) highlight Poland’s contribution to innovation in life sciences IT. Ardigen: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: ~PLN 50 million (est.) Number of employees: 150+ Website: www.ardigen.com Headquarters: Kraków, Poland Main services / focus: AI/ML in drug discovery, bioinformatics, data science, precision medicine software, digital biotech solutions Why Choose Polish IT Companies for Pharma Polish IT companies have built a strong reputation for combining technical expertise with cost efficiency, making them attractive partners for global pharma organizations. The country offers a large pool of highly educated specialists who are experienced in working under strict EU and FDA regulations. Many Polish providers also invest heavily in R&D and AI, ensuring access to the latest innovations in data analytics, clinical platforms, and digital health. Their proximity to major European markets guarantees smooth communication and alignment with regulatory frameworks. This unique mix of skills, compliance, and innovation positions Poland as a reliable hub for pharma technology services. Key Factors When Selecting a Pharma IT Partner Selecting the right IT vendor for pharma requires careful consideration of both technical and regulatory capabilities. Beyond standard expertise in software development, providers must demonstrate experience with GxP, GMP, and GDPR compliance. It is also critical to assess their track record in delivering validated systems and managing sensitive patient or clinical data securely. Decision-makers should evaluate whether the partner offers scalable solutions, such as cloud and AI, that can adapt to future needs. Finally, strong communication, transparent project management, and industry references are essential to ensuring long-term success in pharma IT projects. Leverage TTMS for Pharma IT Success – Our Experience in Action Choosing the right technology partner is crucial for pharmaceutical companies to innovate safely and efficiently. Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) offers the full spectrum of IT services tailored to the pharma sector, backed by a rich portfolio of successful projects. We invite you to explore some of our impactful case studies – each demonstrating TTMS’s ability to solve complex pharma challenges with technology. Below are our latest case studies showing how we support global clients in transforming their business: Chronic Disease Management System – A digital therapeutics solution for diabetes care, integrating insulin pumps and glucose sensors to improve adherence. Business Analytics and Optimization – Data-driven insights enabling pharmaceutical organizations to optimize performance and enhance decision-making. Vendor Management System for Healthcare – Streamlining contractor and vendor processes in pharma to ensure compliance and efficiency. Patient Portal (PingOne + Adobe AEM) – A secure and high-performance patient platform with integrated single sign-on for safe access. Automated Workforce Management – Replacing spreadsheets with an integrated system to improve planning and save costs. Supply Chain Cost Management – Enhancing transparency and control over supply chain costs in the pharma industry. Customized Finance Management System – Building a tailor-made finance platform to meet the specific needs of a global enterprise. Reporting and Data Analysis Efficiency – Improving reporting speed and quality with advanced analytics tools. SAP CIAM Implementation for Healthcare – Delivering secure identity and access management for a healthcare provider. Each of these examples showcases TTMS’s commitment to quality, innovation, and understanding of pharma regulations. Whether you need to modernize legacy systems, harness AI for research, or ensure compliance across your IT landscape – our team is ready to help your pharmaceutical business thrive in the digital age. Contact us to discuss how we can support your goals with proven expertise and tailor-made solutions. How do IT vendors support regulatory inspections in the pharma sector? IT vendors experienced in pharma often build solutions with audit trails, automated reporting, and strict access control that make regulatory inspections smoother. They also provide documentation aligned with GMP and GAMP5 standards, which inspectors typically require. Some vendors offer validation packages that demonstrate compliance from day one. This not only reduces inspection risks but also saves valuable time during audits. Ultimately, an IT partner becomes part of the compliance ecosystem rather than just a technology supplier. Can Polish IT providers help reduce the time-to-market for new drugs? Yes, Polish IT providers frequently implement AI and automation to speed up processes like clinical trial management, data analysis, and patient recruitment. Faster and more reliable data handling allows pharma companies to make informed decisions more quickly. These efficiencies shorten the development timeline and can lead to earlier regulatory submissions. In some cases, innovative platforms built in Poland have cut months from the R&D cycle. This ability to accelerate time-to-market is one of the biggest advantages of working with a tech-savvy partner. What role does data security play in choosing a pharma IT partner? Data security is paramount in pharma because of the sensitivity of patient information and clinical data. A reliable vendor must follow strict cybersecurity protocols, encryption standards, and comply with GDPR and HIPAA. Many Polish providers invest in secure data centers and cloud platforms certified by global standards. They also implement monitoring and anomaly detection systems to prevent breaches. Companies that prioritize data security not only protect patient trust but also safeguard the company’s reputation. How do cultural and geographic factors influence collaboration with Polish IT firms? Poland’s central location in Europe ensures overlapping working hours with both Western Europe and North America, which improves communication. Cultural proximity and strong English proficiency make collaboration smoother than with many offshore destinations. Additionally, Polish teams often adopt agile methodologies that encourage transparency and regular feedback. This makes cooperation with global pharma firms efficient and predictable. Such cultural and geographic alignment is a hidden but powerful advantage when selecting a vendor. Are Polish IT providers active in emerging areas like digital therapeutics and AI in drug discovery? Absolutely, many Polish IT companies are pioneers in digital therapeutics, mobile health apps, and AI solutions tailored for drug discovery. They collaborate closely with research organizations and biotech startups, bringing innovation directly into pharma pipelines. For example, AI algorithms can help identify promising compounds or predict patient responses. Digital therapeutics developed by Polish teams support patient engagement and improve adherence to treatment. This forward-looking expertise ensures pharma companies are prepared for the future of medicine.
Read
Top 10 Salesforce Implementation Companies in Poland (2025 Ranking)
TOP 10 Salesforce Implementation Companies in Poland – Ranking of the Best Providers Salesforce’s customer relationship management (CRM) platform is used by thousands of companies worldwide – and Poland is no exception. As more Polish businesses embrace Salesforce to boost sales, service, and marketing, many turn to expert partners for implementation. Below we highlight ten leading companies in Poland that specialize in implementing Salesforce. These include homegrown Polish providers as well as global consulting firms active on the Polish market. Each offers distinct expertise in deploying and customizing Salesforce to meet business needs. 1. Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) is a Poland-headquartered Salesforce consulting partner known for its end-to-end implementation services. Operating since 2015, TTMS has grown rapidly, now employing over 800 IT professionals and maintaining offices in major Polish cities (Warsaw, Lublin, Wrocław, Bialystok, Lodz, Cracow, Poznan and Koszalin) as well as abroad (Malaysia, Denmark, UK, Switzerland, India). TTMS’s Salesforce team provides full-cycle CRM deployments – from needs analysis and custom development to integration and ongoing support. The company is a certified Salesforce Partner, ensuring access to the latest platform features and training. TTMS has delivered successful projects for clients in pharma, manufacturing, finance, and other industries. It differentiates itself through a flexible, client-centric approach: solutions are tailored to each organization’s processes, and TTMS places emphasis on understanding business needs before implementation. In addition to core CRM setup, TTMS offers Salesforce integration (including connecting Salesforce with other enterprise systems) and innovative capabilities like Salesforce-AI integrations to help companies leverage artificial intelligence within their CRM. With its combination of technical expertise and focus on long-term client support, TTMS is often regarded as a reliable one-stop shop for Salesforce implementation in Poland. TTMS: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: PLN 233.7 million Number of employees: 800+ Website: www.ttms.com/salesforce Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Salesforce, AI, AEM, Azure, Power Apps, BI, Webcon, e-learning, Quality Management 2. Deloitte Digital (Poland) Deloitte Digital Poland is the technology consulting arm of Deloitte, recognized globally as a leading Salesforce implementation partner. In Poland, its large team of certified consultants delivers complex CRM projects across multiple Salesforce clouds, combining strategic business consulting with technical expertise. With global methodologies and a strong local presence, Deloitte Digital supports enterprises in sectors like finance, retail, and manufacturing, making it a trusted partner for large-scale, enterprise-grade implementations. Deloitte Digital Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A (part of Deloitte global) Number of employees: Over 3,000 in Poland (tens of thousands globally) Website: www.deloitte.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland (global HQ: London, UK) Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, digital transformation, cloud consulting, business strategy 3. Accenture (Poland) Accenture Poland is a Platinum-level Salesforce partner with a strong local footprint and thousands of certified experts worldwide. Its teams specialize in large-scale implementations, complex customizations, and integrations, often using Agile methods to accelerate delivery. Known for scale and innovation, Accenture combines local resources with global support, making it ideal for enterprises needing advanced, multi-cloud Salesforce solutions. Accenture Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A (part of Accenture global) Number of employees: Over 7,000 in Poland (700,000+ globally) Website: www.accenture.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland (global HQ: Dublin, Ireland) Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, IT outsourcing, digital strategy, AI integration 4. Capgemini Poland Capgemini Poland is a long-standing Salesforce Global Strategic Partner with hundreds of specialists across hubs in Warsaw, Kraków, and Wrocław. The company supports clients with end-to-end Salesforce projects, from CRM strategy and customization to data migration and long-term support. Leveraging industry-specific accelerators and broad IT expertise, Capgemini is a strong choice for enterprises needing scalable, comprehensive implementations. Capgemini Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A (part of Capgemini global) Number of employees: 11,000+ in Poland (340,000+ globally) Website: www.capgemini.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland (global HQ: Paris, France) Main services / focus: Salesforce consulting, IT outsourcing, cloud migration, digital transformation 5. PwC (Poland) PwC Poland became a strong Salesforce partner after acquiring Outbox Group, gaining a dedicated local delivery team. It combines business advisory expertise with technical CRM implementation, focusing on improving customer experience and measurable business outcomes. With certified consultants and strong governance, PwC is a trusted choice for organizations in regulated industries seeking both strategy and execution. PwC Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A (part of PwC global) Number of employees: 6,000+ in Poland (364,000+ globally) Website: www.pwc.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland (global HQ: London, UK) Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, CRM strategy, cloud solutions, digital transformation 6. Sii Poland Sii Poland is the country’s largest IT consulting and outsourcing firm, with over 7,700 employees and a certified Salesforce practice. Its team supports Sales Cloud and Service Cloud implementations, custom development, and ongoing administration. With strong local presence, flexible engagement models, and industry know-how, Sii is a reliable partner for companies seeking scalable and cost-effective Salesforce solutions. Sii Poland: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: Approx. PLN 2.1 billion Number of employees: 7,700+ Website: www.sii.pl Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, IT outsourcing, software development, cloud consulting 7. Britenet Britenet is a Polish IT services company with around 800 employees and a strong Salesforce practice of 100+ certified experts. It delivers tailored implementations across Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud, and more, often supporting clients through outsourcing models. Known for flexibility and technical excellence, Britenet is a trusted partner for Polish enterprises in sectors like finance, education, and energy. Britenet: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A Number of employees: 800+ Website: www.britenet.com.pl Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, CRM consulting, custom software development 8. Cloudity Cloudity is a Polish-founded Salesforce consultancy that achieved Platinum Partner status and expanded across Europe. With a few hundred certified experts, it delivers end-to-end projects spanning Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, and Experience Cloud. Known for innovation and agility, Cloudity supports clients in sectors like e-commerce, insurance, and technology, offering tailored multi-cloud implementations. Cloudity: company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A Number of employees: 200+ Website: www.cloudity.com Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, CRM strategy, system integration, multi-cloud solutions 9. EPAM Systems (PolSource) EPAM Systems (formerly PolSource) is a global IT firm with one of Poland’s most experienced Salesforce teams, built on the heritage of PolSource’s 350+ certified specialists. It delivers complex CRM implementations, custom development, and global rollouts for clients from startups to Fortune 500 companies. Combining local expertise with EPAM’s global resources, it is a strong choice for organizations needing advanced, large-scale Salesforce solutions. EPAM Systems (PolSource): company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A (part of EPAM global) Number of employees: 350+ Salesforce specialists in Poland (EPAM global: 60,000+) Website: www.epam.com Headquarters: Kraków, Poland (global HQ: Newtown, USA) Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, custom development, global rollouts 10. Craftware (BlueSoft / Orange Group) Craftware is a Polish Salesforce specialist with over a decade of experience and Platinum Partner status since 2014. Now part of BlueSoft/Orange Group, it delivers consulting, implementation, and support services across industries like healthcare, life sciences, and e-commerce. Known for deep Salesforce expertise and agile delivery, Craftware helps clients adapt CRM to complex processes while ensuring effective knowledge transfer. Craftware (BlueSoft / Orange Group): company snapshot Revenues in 2024: N/A (part of BlueSoft/Orange Group) Number of employees: 200+ Website: www.craftware.pl Headquarters: Warsaw, Poland Main services / focus: Salesforce implementation, CRM consulting, custom solutions, integration When should you consider implementing Salesforce? These case studies illustrate how companies across sectors have used Salesforce to solve concrete business challenges. Whether the goal was streamlining data flow, boosting sales process efficiency, improving service support, or ensuring compliance, these examples highlight practical transformations. So, when should Salesforce be implemented? When your construction or installation projects suffer from scattered data and poor cost control, Salesforce can centralize information, automate processes, and equip field teams with real-time mobile tools. When your sales process is disorganized and lacks visibility, Salesforce CRM structures pipelines, standardizes lead management, and improves forecasting accuracy. When your sales department relies on spreadsheets and manual reporting, Salesforce enables digital dashboards, automation, and faster decision-making. When your service support struggles with slow response times and SLA breaches, Salesforce Service Cloud streamlines case management and boosts customer satisfaction. When your organization must track customer consents for compliance, Salesforce provides a single platform to collect, manage, and secure consent data. When reporting takes too much manual effort and leadership lacks insights, Salesforce analytics delivers real-time visibility into key business metrics. When your pharmaceutical business faces strict regulatory requirements, Salesforce helps enforce security controls and maintain compliance. When healthcare or pharma projects need digital health capabilities, Salesforce supports patient data management and remote service delivery. When consent management is fragmented in highly regulated industries, Salesforce integrates platforms to capture and manage patient or customer consents end to end. When NGOs need to modernize donor and volunteer management, Salesforce NPSP transforms engagement, tracking, and program operations. When biopharma companies want AI-driven, smarter customer engagement, Salesforce integrations unlock predictive insights and advanced analytics. Why Choose a Company from the Top Salesforce Implementation Firms in Poland? Selecting a partner from this ranking of leading Salesforce implementation companies in Poland ensures that your CRM project is in capable hands. These firms are proven experts with extensive experience in tailoring Salesforce to diverse industries, which minimizes risks and accelerates results. Top providers employ certified consultants and developers who are up to date with the latest Salesforce features and best practices, guaranteeing both technical excellence and compliance with business requirements. By working with an established partner, you gain access to multidisciplinary teams able to customize, integrate, and scale Salesforce according to your goals. This not only speeds up time to value but also helps optimize costs and maximize return on investment – allowing you to focus on strengthening relationships with your customers while experts handle the technology. Ready to Elevate Your Salesforce Implementation with TTMS? Choosing the right partner is crucial to the success of your Salesforce project. All the companies listed above offer strong capabilities, but Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) uniquely combines local understanding with global expertise. TTMS can guide you through every step of your Salesforce journey – from initial strategy and customization to user training and ongoing support. Our team of certified professionals is committed to delivering a solution that truly fits your business. If you want a Salesforce implementation that drives your growth and a partner who will support you long after launch, TTMS is ready to help. Get in touch with TTMS today to discuss how we can make your Salesforce project a success and empower your organization with a world-class CRM tailored to your needs. What are the key benefits of working with a Salesforce implementation partner in Poland compared to building in-house? Partnering with a Salesforce implementation firm in Poland offers access to certified experts who work daily with diverse projects across industries. This experience allows them to avoid common pitfalls and accelerate delivery timelines, which can be difficult for in-house teams without prior exposure. Additionally, outsourcing reduces the cost of recruitment, training, and retaining Salesforce specialists while ensuring compliance with international best practices. Local partners also bring cultural alignment, proximity, and industry-specific knowledge that global centers of excellence may lack. How long does a typical Salesforce implementation project take? The duration varies depending on scope, complexity, and the number of Salesforce clouds involved. A straightforward Sales Cloud rollout for a medium-sized company may take as little as two to three months, while enterprise-scale multi-cloud implementations can last six to twelve months or longer. The key factor is preparation: clearly defined requirements, engaged stakeholders, and proper change management often shorten timelines and reduce rework. Working with experienced partners helps set realistic expectations and ensures milestones are achieved on schedule. How much does Salesforce implementation cost in Poland? Costs depend on project size, customization, and whether advanced features such as AI, analytics, or integrations are required. Small deployments might start at several tens of thousands of PLN, while enterprise-scale projects can reach into the millions. Polish providers often offer a cost advantage compared to Western European or US firms, while still maintaining high quality thanks to certified talent and mature delivery methodologies. Many companies also offer flexible models such as fixed-price projects or dedicated outsourced teams. What industries in Poland benefit most from Salesforce adoption? While Salesforce is versatile and industry-agnostic, some sectors in Poland particularly benefit. Financial services and banking rely on Salesforce for regulatory compliance and customer insights. Manufacturing and construction companies use it to streamline project management and sales forecasting. Pharma and healthcare organizations value Salesforce for its security, compliance, and patient engagement features. NGOs increasingly adopt Salesforce NPSP to modernize donor management. In short, any organization that needs structured customer data, sales efficiency, or regulatory alignment can see tangible results. How do Polish Salesforce partners ensure data security and compliance? Polish Salesforce implementation companies typically follow both EU-wide regulations like GDPR and sector-specific compliance requirements such as pharmaceutical data standards. Certified consultants design architectures that leverage Salesforce’s built-in security features, including role-based access, encryption, and audit trails. Partners also help integrate consent management tools and implement governance frameworks tailored to the client’s industry. Regular training, documentation, and security testing further ensure that sensitive customer data is protected and regulatory obligations are fully met.
Read
EU AI Act Update 2025: Code of Practice, Enforcement & Industry Reactions
EU AI Act Latest Developments: Code of Practice, Enforcement, Timeline & Industry Reactions The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) is entering a critical new phase of implementation in 2025. As a follow-up to our February 2025 introduction to this landmark regulation, this article examines the latest developments shaping its rollout. We cover the newly finalized Code of Practice for general-purpose AI (GPAI), the enforcement powers of the European AI Office, a timeline of implementation from August 2025 through 2027, early reactions from AI industry leaders like xAI, Meta, and Google, and strategic guidance to help business leaders ensure compliance and protect their reputations. General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: A Voluntary Compliance Framework One of the most significant recent milestones is the release of the General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice – a comprehensive set of voluntary guidelines intended to help AI providers meet the EU AI Act’s requirements for foundation models. Published on July 10, 2025, the Code was developed by independent experts through a multi-stakeholder process and endorsed by the European Commission’s new AI Office. It serves as a non-binding framework covering three key areas: transparency, copyright compliance, and safety and security in advanced AI models. In practice, this means GPAI providers (think developers of large language models, generative AI systems, etc.) are given concrete measures and documentation templates to ensure they disclose necessary information, respect intellectual property laws, and mitigate any systemic risks from their most powerful models. Although adhering to the Code is optional, it offers a crucial benefit: a “presumption of conformity” with the AI Act. In other words, companies that sign on to the Code are deemed to comply with the law’s GPAI obligations, enjoying greater legal certainty and a lighter administrative burden in audits and assessments. This carrot-and-stick approach strongly incentivizes major AI providers to participate. Indeed, within weeks of the Code’s publication, dozens of tech firms – including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic and others – had voluntarily signed on as early signatories, signalling their intent to follow these best practices. The Code’s endorsement by the European Commission and the EU’s AI Board (a body of member state regulators) in August 2025 further cemented its status as an authoritative compliance tool. Providers that choose not to adhere to the Code will face stricter scrutiny: they must independently prove to regulators how their alternative measures fulfill each requirement of the AI Act. The European AI Office: Central Enforcer and AI Oversight Hub To oversee and enforce the EU AI Act, the European Commission established a dedicated regulator known as the European AI Office in early 2024. Housed within the Commission’s DG CONNECT, this office serves as the EU-wide center of AI expertise and enforcement coordination. Its primary role is to monitor, supervise, and ensure compliance with the AI Act’s rules – especially for general-purpose AI models – across all 27 Member States. The AI Office has been empowered with significant enforcement tools: it can conduct evaluations of AI models, demand technical documentation and information from AI providers, require corrective measures for non-compliance, and even recommend sanctions or fines in serious cases. Importantly, the AI Office is responsible for drawing up and updating codes of practice (like the GPAI Code) under Article 56 of the Act, and it acts as the Secretariat for the new European AI Board, which coordinates national regulators. In practical terms, the European AI Office will work hand-in-hand with Member States’ authorities to achieve consistent enforcement. For example, if a general-purpose AI model is suspected of non-compliance or poses unforeseen systemic risks, the AI Office can launch an investigation in collaboration with national market surveillance agencies. It will help organize joint investigations across borders when the same AI system is deployed in multiple countries, ensuring that issues like biased algorithms or unsafe AI deployments are addressed uniformly. By facilitating information-sharing and guiding national regulators (similar to how the European Data Protection Board works under GDPR), the AI Office aims to prevent regulatory fragmentation. As a central hub, it also represents the EU in international AI governance discussions and oversees innovation-friendly measures like AI sandboxes (controlled environments for testing AI) and SME support programs. For business leaders, this means there is now a one-stop European authority focusing on AI compliance – companies can expect the AI Office to issue guidance, handle certain approvals or registrations, and lead major enforcement actions for AI systems that transcend individual countries’ jurisdictions. Timeline for AI Act Implementation: August 2025 to 2027 The EU AI Act is being rolled out in phases, with key obligations kicking in between 2025 and 2027. The regulation formally entered into force on August 1, 2024, but its provisions were not all active immediately. Instead, a staggered timeline gives organizations time to adapt. The first milestone came just six months in: by February 2025, the Act’s bans on certain “unacceptable-risk” AI practices (e.g. social scoring, exploitative manipulation of vulnerable groups, and real-time remote biometric identification in public for law enforcement) became legally binding. Any AI system falling under these prohibited categories must have been ceased or removed from the EU market by that date, marking an early test of compliance. Next, on August 2, 2025, the rules for general-purpose AI models take effect. From this date forward, any new foundation model or large-scale AI system (meeting the GPAI definition) introduced to the EU market is required to comply with the AI Act’s transparency, safety, and copyright measures. This includes providing detailed technical documentation to regulators and users, disclosing the data used for training (at least in summary form), and implementing risk mitigation for advanced models. Notably, there is an important grace period for existing AI models that were already on the market before August 2025: those providers have until August 2, 2027 to bring legacy models and their documentation into full compliance. This two-year transitional window acknowledges that updating already-deployed AI systems (and retrofitting documentation or risk controls) takes time. During this period, voluntary tools like the GPAI Code of Practice serve as an interim compliance bridge, helping companies align with requirements before formal standards are finalized around 2027. The AI Act’s remaining obligations phase in by 2026-2027. By August 2026 (two years post-entry into force), the majority of provisions become fully applicable, including requirements for high-risk AI systems in areas like healthcare, finance, employment, and critical infrastructure. These high-risk systems – which must undergo conformity assessments, logging, human oversight, and more – have a slightly longer lead time, with their compliance deadline at the three-year mark (around late 2027) according to the legislation. In effect, the period from mid-2025 through 2027 is when companies will feel the AI Act’s bite: first in the generative and general-purpose AI domain, and subsequently across regulated industry-specific AI applications. Businesses should mark August 2025 and August 2026 on their calendars for incremental responsibilities, with August 2027 as the horizon by which all AI systems in scope need to meet the new EU standards. Regulators have also indicated that formal “harmonized standards” for AI (technical standards developed via European standards organizations) are expected by 2027 to further streamline compliance. Industry Reactions: What xAI, Google, and Meta Reveal How have AI companies responded so far to this evolving regulatory landscape? Early signals from industry leaders provide a telling snapshot of both support and concern. On one hand, many big players have publicly embraced the EU’s approach. For example, Google affirmed it would sign the new Code of Practice, and Microsoft’s President Brad Smith indicated Microsoft was likely to do the same. Numerous AI developers see value in the coherence and stability that the AI Act promises – by harmonizing rules across Europe, it can reduce legal uncertainty and potentially raise user trust in AI products. This supportive camp is evidenced by the long list of initial Code of Practice signatories, which includes not just enterprise tech giants but also a range of startups and research-focused firms from Europe and abroad. On the other hand, some prominent companies have voiced reservations or chosen a more cautious engagement. Notably, Elon Musk’s AI venture xAI made headlines in July 2025 by agreeing to sign only the “Safety and Security” chapter of the GPAI Code – and pointedly not the transparency or copyright sections. In a public statement, xAI said that while it “supports AI safety” and will adhere to the safety chapter, it finds the Act’s other parts “profoundly detrimental to innovation” and believes the copyright rules represent an overreach. This partial compliance stance suggests a concern that overly strict transparency or data disclosure mandates could expose proprietary information or stifle competitive advantage. Likewise, Meta (Facebook’s parent company) took a more oppositional stance: Meta declined to sign the Code of Practice at all, arguing that the voluntary Code introduces “legal uncertainties for model developers” and imposes measures that go “far beyond the scope of the AI Act”. In other words, Meta felt the Code’s commitments might be too onerous or premature, given that they extend into areas not explicitly dictated by the law itself (Meta has been particularly vocal about issues like open-source model obligations and copyright filters, which the company sees as problematic). These divergent reactions reveal an industry both cognizant of AI’s societal risks and wary of regulatory constraints. Companies like Google and OpenAI, by quickly endorsing the Code of Practice, signal that they are willing to meet higher transparency and safety bars – possibly to pre-empt stricter enforcement and to position themselves as responsible leaders. In contrast, pushback from players like Meta and the nuanced participation of xAI highlight a fear that EU rules might undercut competitiveness or force unwanted disclosures of AI training data and methods. It’s also telling that some governments and experts share these concerns; for instance, during the Code’s approval, one EU member state (Belgium) reportedly raised objections about gaps in the copyright chapter, reflecting ongoing debates about how best to balance innovation with regulation. As the AI Act moves from paper to practice, expect continued dialogue between regulators and industry. The European Commission has indicated it will update the Code of Practice as technology evolves, and companies – even skeptics – will likely engage in that process to make their voices heard. Strategic Guidance for Business Leaders With the EU AI Act’s requirements steadily coming into force, business leaders should take proactive steps now to ensure compliance and manage both legal and reputational risks. Here are key strategic considerations for organizations deploying or developing AI: Audit Your AI Portfolio and Risk-Classify Systems: Begin by mapping out all AI systems, tools, or models your company uses or provides. Determine which ones might fall under the AI Act’s definitions of high-risk AI systems (e.g. AI in regulated fields like health, finance, HR, etc.) or general-purpose AI models (broad AI models that could be adapted to many tasks). This risk classification is essential – high-risk systems will need to meet stricter requirements (e.g. conformity assessments, documentation, human oversight), while GPAI providers have specific transparency and safety obligations. By understanding where each AI system stands, you can prioritize compliance efforts on the most critical areas. Establish AI Governance and Compliance Processes: Treat AI compliance as a cross-functional responsibility involving your legal, IT, data science, and risk management teams. Develop internal guidelines or an AI governance framework aligned with the AI Act. For high-risk AI applications, this means creating processes for thorough risk assessments, data quality checks, record-keeping, and human-in-the-loop oversight before deployment. For general-purpose AI development, implement procedures to document training data sources, methodologies to mitigate biases or errors, and security testing for model outputs. Many companies are appointing “AI compliance leads” or committees to oversee these tasks and to stay updated on regulatory guidance. Leverage the GPAI Code of Practice and Standards: If your organization develops large AI models or foundation models, consider signing onto the EU’s GPAI Code of Practice or at least using it as a blueprint. Adhering to this voluntary Code can serve as evidence of good-faith compliance efforts and will likely satisfy regulators that you meet the AI Act’s requirements during this interim period before formal standards arrive. Even if you choose not to formally sign, the Code’s recommendations on transparency (like providing model documentation forms), on copyright compliance (such as policies for respecting copyrighted training data), and on safety (like conducting adversarial testing and red-teaming of models) are valuable best practices that can improve your risk posture. Monitor Regulatory Updates and Engage: The AI regulatory environment will continue evolving through 2026 and beyond. Keep an eye on communications from the European AI Office and the AI Board – they will issue guidelines, Q&As, and possibly clarification on ambiguous points in the Act. It’s wise to budget for legal review of these updates and to participate in industry forums or consultations if possible. Engaging with regulators (directly or through industry associations) can give your company a voice in how rules are interpreted, such as shaping upcoming harmonized standards or future revisions of the Code of Practice. Proactive engagement can also demonstrate your commitment to responsible AI, which can be a reputational asset. Prepare for Transparency and Customer Communications: A often overlooked aspect of the AI Act is the emphasis on transparency not just to regulators but also to users. High-risk AI systems will require user notifications (e.g. that they are interacting with AI and not a human in certain cases), and AI-generated content may need labels. Start preparing plain-language disclosures about your AI’s capabilities and limits. Additionally, consider how you’ll handle inquiries or audits – if an EU regulator or the AI Office asks for your algorithmic documentation or evidence of risk controls, having those materials ready will expedite the process and avoid last-minute scrambles. Being transparent and forthcoming can also boost public trust, turning compliance into a competitive advantage rather than just a checkbox. Finally, business leaders should view compliance not as a static checkbox but as part of building a broader culture of trustworthy AI. The EU AI Act has put ethics and human rights at the center of AI governance. Companies that align with these values – prioritizing user safety, fairness, and accountability in AI – stand to strengthen their brand reputation. Conversely, a failure to comply or a high-profile AI incident (such as a biased outcome or safety failure) could invite not only regulatory penalties (up to €35 million or 7% of global turnover for the worst violations) but also public backlash. In the coming years, investors, customers, and partners are likely to favor businesses that can demonstrate their AI is well-governed and compliant. By taking the steps above, organizations can mitigate legal risk, avoid last-minute fire drills as deadlines loom, and position themselves as leaders in the emerging era of AI regulation. TTMS AI Solutions – Automate With Confidence As the EU AI Act moves from paper to practice, organizations need practical tools that balance compliance, performance, and speed. Transition Technologies MS (TTMS) delivers enterprise-grade AI solutions that are secure, scalable, and tailored to real business workflows. AI4Legal – Automation for legal teams: accelerate document review, drafting, and case summarization while maintaining traceability and control. AI4Content – Document analysis at scale: process and synthesize reports, forms, and transcripts into structured, decision-ready outputs. AI4E-Learning – Training content, faster: transform internal materials into modular courses with quizzes, instructors’ notes, and easy editing. AI4Knowledge – Find answers, not files: a central knowledge hub with natural-language search to cut time spent hunting for procedures and know-how. AI4Localisation – Multilingual at enterprise pace: context-aware translations tuned for tone, terminology, and brand consistency across markets. AML Track – Automated AML compliance: streamline KYC, PEP and sanctions screening, ongoing monitoring, and audit-ready reporting in one platform. Our experts partner with your teams end-to-end – from scoping and governance to integration and change management – so you get measurable impact, not just another tool. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) When will the EU AI Act be fully enforced, and what are the key dates? The EU AI Act is being phased in over several years. It formally took effect in August 2024, but its requirements activate at different milestones. The ban on certain unacceptable AI practices (like social scoring and manipulative AI) started in February 2025. By August 2, 2025, rules for general-purpose AI models (foundation models) become applicable – any new AI model introduced after that date must comply. Most other provisions, including obligations for many high-risk AI systems, kick in by August 2026 (two years after entry into force). One final deadline is August 2027, by which providers of existing AI models (those that were on the market before the Act) need to bring those systems into compliance. In short, the period from mid-2025 through 2027 is when the AI Act’s requirements gradually turn from theory into practice. What is the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI, and do companies have to sign it? The Code of Practice for GPAI is a voluntary set of guidelines designed to help AI model providers comply with the EU AI Act’s rules on general-purpose AI (like large language models or generative AI systems). It covers best practices for transparency (documenting how the AI was developed and its limitations), copyright (ensuring respect for intellectual property in training data), and safety/security (testing and mitigating risks from powerful AI models). Companies do not have to sign the Code – it’s optional – but there’s a big incentive to do so. If you adhere to the Code, regulators will presume you’re meeting the AI Act’s requirements (“presumption of conformity”), which gives you legal reassurance. Many major AI firms have signed on already. However, if a company chooses not to follow the Code, it must independently demonstrate compliance through other means. In summary, the Code isn’t mandatory, but it’s a highly recommended shortcut to compliance for those who develop general-purpose AI. How will the European AI Office enforce the AI Act, and what powers does it have? The European AI Office is a new EU-level regulator set up to ensure the AI Act is applied consistently across all member states. Think of it as Europe’s central AI “watchdog.” The AI Office has several important enforcement powers: it can request detailed information and technical documentation from companies about their AI systems, conduct evaluations and tests on AI models (especially the big general-purpose models) to check for compliance, and coordinate investigations if an AI system is suspected to violate the rules. While daily enforcement (like market checks or handling complaints) will still involve national authorities in each EU country, the AI Office guides and unifies these efforts, much like the European Data Protection Board does for privacy law. The AI Office can also help initiate penalties – under the AI Act, fines can be steep (up to €35 million or 7% of global annual revenue for serious breaches). In essence, the AI Office will be the go-to authority at the EU level: drafting guidance, managing the Code of Practice, and making sure companies don’t fall through the cracks of different national regulators. Does the EU AI Act affect non-EU companies, such as American or Asian firms? Yes. The AI Act has an extraterritorial scope very similar to the EU’s GDPR. If a company outside Europe is providing an AI system or service that is used in the EU or affects people in the EU, that company is expected to comply with the AI Act for those activities. It doesn’t matter where the company is headquartered or where the AI model was developed – what matters is the impact on the European market or users. For instance, if a U.S. tech company offers a generative AI tool to EU customers, or an Asian manufacturer sells a robot with AI capabilities into Europe, they fall under the Act’s provisions. Non-EU firms might need to appoint an EU representative (a local point of contact) for regulatory purposes, and they will face the same obligations (and potential fines) as European companies for non-compliance. In short, if your AI touches Europe, assume the EU AI Act applies. How should businesses start preparing for EU AI Act compliance now? To prepare, businesses should take a multi-pronged approach: First, educate your leadership and product teams about the AI Act’s requirements and identify which of your AI systems are impacted. Next, conduct a gap analysis or audit of those systems – do you have the necessary documentation, risk controls, and transparency measures in place? If not, start implementing them. It’s wise to establish an internal AI governance program, bringing together legal, technical, and operational stakeholders to oversee compliance. For companies building AI models, consider following the EU’s Code of Practice for GPAI as a framework. Also, update contracts and supply chain checks – ensure that any AI tech you procure from vendors meets EU standards (you may need assurances or compliance clauses from your providers). Finally, stay agile: keep track of new guidelines from the European AI Office or any standardization efforts, as these will further clarify what regulators expect. By acting early – well before the major 2025 and 2026 deadlines – businesses can avoid scrambling last-minute and use compliance as an opportunity to bolster trust in their AI offerings.
Read
Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) in Space Projects – Explanation and Significance
Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) are a measurement scale for assessing the maturity of a technology, widely used in the space industry (and beyond) to evaluate how far a new technology has progressed towards practical use. The scale consists of nine levels, from TRL 1 at the very beginning of an idea or concept, up to TRL 9 which denotes a fully mature technology proven in real operational conditions. This framework was originally developed by NASA in the 1970s and later adopted by organizations like the U.S. Department of Defense, the European Space Agency (ESA), and the European Union to ensure consistent discussions of technology maturity across different projects. In essence, TRLs provide a common language for engineers, managers, and investors to gauge how ready a technology is for deployment. What Are Technology Readiness Levels? In simple terms, a technology’s TRL indicates how far along it is in development, from the earliest theoretical research to a functioning system in the field. A new concept starts at the lowest level (TRL 1) and advances through experimentation, prototyping, and testing until it reaches the highest level (TRL 9), meaning it has been proven in an actual operational environment (for space projects, this typically means a successful flight mission). Each step up the TRL ladder represents a milestone in the project’s evolution, reducing technical uncertainties and moving closer to application. Originally introduced by NASA, the TRL scale quickly became a standard in project management because it helps quantify progress and risk – a TRL 3 technology (for example) is understood to be at an early lab demonstration stage, whereas a TRL 7 or 8 technology is nearing real-world use. This common understanding is valuable for planning, funding decisions, and cross-team communication in complex aerospace projects. The 9 Levels of the TRL Scale According to NASA and other agencies, the TRL scale is defined as follows: TRL 1 – Basic Principles Observed: Scientific research is just beginning. The fundamental principles of a new concept are observed and reported, but practical applications are not yet developed. (This is essentially the stage of idea inception or basic research.) TRL 2 – Technology Concept Formulated: The basic idea is fleshed out into a potential application. The technology concept and possible use cases are postulated, but it remains speculative – there is no experimental proof or detailed analysis yet. TRL 3 – Proof of Concept (Analytical and Experimental): Active research and development begin to validate the feasibility of the concept. Analytical studies and laboratory experiments are performed to demonstrate proof-of-concept for key functions or characteristics. At this stage, a laboratory demonstration or experimental prototype of the critical components is often built to show that the idea can work in principle. TRL 4 – Component Validation in Laboratory: A rudimentary version of the technology (breadboard) is built and tested in a lab setting. Multiple components or subsystems are integrated to verify that they work together and meet certain performance benchmarks under controlled conditions. Success at TRL 4 means the core technical components function in a lab environment. TRL 5 – Component Validation in Relevant Environment: The technology (still at prototype/breadboard level) is tested in an environment that simulates real-world conditions as closely as possible. This might involve environmental chambers or field test conditions relevant to the final application (for space, think vacuum chambers, radiation, or thermal conditions similar to space). Reaching TRL 5 demonstrates the technology’s performance in a simulated operational environment, bridging the gap between pure lab tests and real conditions. TRL 6 – System/Subsystem Model or Prototype Demonstrated in Relevant Environment: A fully functional prototype or system model is tested in a relevant environment, meaning a high-fidelity simulation or field environment that closely matches the real operational setting. By TRL 6, the prototype has working features and performance close to the final intended system, and it has undergone rigorous testing in conditions approximating its target environment (for example, a prototype satellite instrument might be tested on a high-altitude balloon or an aircraft). TRL 7 – System Prototype Demonstration in Operational Environment: A near-final prototype is demonstrated in an actual operational environment. For space projects, TRL 7 often means a prototype has been test-flown in space or in a mission-like scenario. This level is a significant milestone: the system prototype operates in the real world (orbit, deep space, etc.), proving that it can perform its intended functions under actual mission conditions. TRL 8 – Actual System Completed and Qualified Through Testing: The final system is complete and has passed all required tests and evaluations. At TRL 8, the technology is “flight qualified,” meaning it has been verified to work in its intended operational environment through testing and demonstration. Essentially, the product is ready for deployment – all designs are frozen, and the technology meets the standards and certifications needed for use in an actual mission. TRL 9 – Actual System Proven in Mission Operations: The technology is fully operational and has been successfully used in a mission or operational setting. Reaching TRL 9 means the system is “flight proven” – it has performed reliably during one or more real missions, meeting all objectives in an operational environment. At this point, the technology is considered mature; it has transitioned from development into real-world service. As the above scale shows, each TRL corresponds to a phase of development in a project’s life cycle. For example, at TRL 3 the team has demonstrated a proof-of-concept in laboratory conditions (showing that the core idea is workable). By TRL 6, there is a working prototype tested in a relevant environment that approximates the final operating conditions. And by TRL 9, the system has not only been built and tested but also successfully operated in a real mission, proving its readiness beyond any doubt. Understanding these levels helps project managers and stakeholders to gauge progress: moving from one TRL to the next typically requires overcoming specific technical hurdles and completing certain tests or demonstrations. Risk Management and the “Valley of Death” in TRL Progression One of the key reasons the TRL framework is so valuable is that it helps in managing technological risk. Early-stage technologies (TRL 1–3) carry high uncertainty – many concepts at this stage might fail because the basic science is unproven. However, the cost of exploration at low TRLs is relatively small (mostly analytical work and bench-top experiments). As a project advances to intermediate levels (TRL 4–6), it enters a phase of building prototypes and testing in simulated environments. Here, both the investment and the stakes increase: the project is no longer just theory, but not yet proven in real deployment. This middle stage is often where projects struggle, facing what’s colloquially known as the technological “Valley of Death.” The “Valley of Death” refers to the critical gap between a validated prototype and a fully operational system. In terms of TRL, it is most commonly associated with the transition from about TRL 5–6 to TRL 7, when a technology must move from demonstration in a relevant environment to demonstration in a true operational environment (for space, that means actually going to space). Bridging this gap is challenging because costs rise steeply and opportunities for testing can be scarce. A NASA study noted that the expense and effort required to advance a technology increase dramatically at higher TRLs – for instance, getting from TRL 5 to TRL 6 can cost multiple times more than all the work from TRL 1 to 5 combined, and moving from TRL 6 to TRL 7 is an even bigger leap. At TRL 7, an actual system prototype must be demonstrated in the target environment, which for a space technology means a flight test or orbital deployment – an endeavor requiring significant funding, meticulous engineering, and often a willingness to accept high risk. It is during this jump (often called the “TRL 6–7 transition”) that many projects falter, either due to technical issues, budget constraints, or the difficulty of securing a flight opportunity. This is the notorious “Death Valley” of tech innovation, where promising prototypes may languish without ever reaching a mission. Effectively managing risk through this TRL valley involves careful planning and incremental testing, as well as often seeking partnerships or funding programs specifically aimed at technology demonstration. Agencies like NASA and ESA have programs to support technologies through this phase, precisely because it’s so pivotal. A successful strategy is to use iterative prototyping and demonstration projects (for example, testing on suborbital rockets, balloon flights, or the International Space Station for space tech) to gather data and build confidence gradually before committing to a full mission. Additionally, understanding where a project sits on the TRL scale allows decision-makers to tailor their expectations and risk management approach: low-TRL projects need research-oriented management and tolerance for failure, whereas high-TRL projects (closer to deployment) demand rigorous validation, quality assurance, and reliability testing to ensure mission success. TTMS – Supporting Projects at All TRL Stages Transition Technologies Managed Services (TTMS) is a technology partner that recognizes the importance of the TRL framework in guiding project development, especially in high-stakes sectors like space and defense. As a provider of services for the space industry, TTMS emphasizes that it can support projects at every TRL level – from early R&D and prototyping all the way to full implementation and operational deployment. In fact, TTMS notes that it offers expertise across all technology domains and “on all technology readiness levels” for space missions. This means that whether a project is just a concept on the drawing board (TRL 1–2), in the proof-of-concept or prototyping phase (TRL 3–6), or nearly ready for launch and deployment (TRL 7–9), TTMS can provide relevant support and services. Practically, TTMS’s involvement can take many forms depending on the TRL stage. For example, in the low-TRL phases (idea, concept, and proof-of-concept), TTMS can contribute research expertise, feasibility studies, or help prepare a proof of concept through its consultants’ technical advice. This might involve software simulations, algorithm development, or lab prototyping to validate basic principles. As the project moves into mid-TRL development (building full prototypes and testing), TTMS is prepared to support the development effort by providing complete software solutions or dedicated components and engineers, ensuring that the prototype meets its requirements and can be tested in relevant conditions. For projects approaching deployment (high TRLs), TTMS can assist with final system integration, verification and validation (IV&V), and even product assurance and quality assurance processes to make sure the technology is mission-ready. Notably, TTMS has experience in space-sector Product Assurance (PA) and Quality Assurance (QA) and can cover those needs for space missions at all TRL stages – helping increase the mission’s success rate by ensuring reliability and safety standards are met. By being able to engage at any TRL, TTMS helps organizations navigate the challenges unique to each stage. For instance, bridging the TRL 6–7 gap (“Valley of Death”) often requires not just funding but also the right technical guidance and project management expertise. TTMS’s broad experience allows it to assist teams in planning that critical jump – from preparing a robust demonstration plan to implementing risk mitigation strategies and even contributing specialized personnel for testing campaigns. In other words, TTMS offers end-to-end support: from innovative R&D (where flexibility and creativity are key) to later-stage deployment and maintenance (where process discipline and assurance dominate). This versatility is a strong asset for any space project consortium that must traverse the entire TRL spectrum to deliver a successful mission. Conclusion The Technology Readiness Level scale provides a clear roadmap of technological maturity, which is invaluable in the space industry for aligning expectations, managing risks, and making investment decisions. By breaking development into TRL stages, teams can celebrate progress in tangible steps – from the spark of a new idea (TRL 1) to a fully operational capability (TRL 9) – and stakeholders can communicate about the project’s status with a common understanding of what remains to be done. Importantly, recognizing the significance of each TRL also highlights why certain transitions (like moving from a tested prototype to a flight-ready system) are so challenging and crucial. This educational insight into TRLs underpins better project planning and risk management, helping to avoid pitfalls in the notorious “Valley of Death” and beyond. For companies like TTMS that work with space-sector clients, TRLs are not just abstract labels – they guide how to tailor support and services to the project’s needs. By supporting projects across all TRL levels, TTMS demonstrates a comprehensive capability: whether it’s nurturing a concept in the lab or fine-tuning a system for launch, the goal is to help innovative technologies make it through every phase of development and ultimately achieve mission success. In summary, understanding and utilizing Technology Readiness Levels is key to driving space projects forward, and having the right partners in place at each level can make the difference in turning a promising technology into an operational reality. FAQ Who developed the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale? The Technology Readiness Level scale was initially developed by NASA in the 1970s as a structured way to evaluate and communicate the maturity of emerging technologies. It has since been adopted globally by various organizations, including the European Space Agency (ESA), the U.S. Department of Defense, and the European Union. Its widespread use comes from its effectiveness in providing a clear, universal framework for technology assessment, helping stakeholders understand exactly how advanced a particular technology is, managing associated risks, making informed investment decisions, and facilitating clear communication between technical teams, managers, and investors across multiple industries. Why is TRL important for space projects? In space and defense projects, technological reliability and performance are critically important due to high stakes, substantial investments, and severe consequences in case of failures. The TRL scale helps project teams systematically address and mitigate risks at each development phase. By clearly defining stages from basic theoretical concepts (TRL 1) to fully operational, mission-proven systems (TRL 9), the scale ensures that technologies are rigorously tested and validated before deployment, thus significantly reducing uncertainties and risks inherent in these high-stakes sectors. What does the transition from TRL 6 to TRL 7 involve? The transition between TRL 6 (prototype tested in simulated operational conditions) and TRL 7 (demonstration of the prototype in actual operational conditions) is notoriously challenging and referred to as the “Valley of Death.” At this critical juncture, projects often face exponentially increasing costs, heightened complexity, and limited opportunities for real-world testing. Many technologies fail to make this leap due to inadequate funding, unforeseen technical challenges, or the inability to secure partnerships or test environments required for demonstration. Successfully bridging this gap requires meticulous risk management, substantial financial investment, strategic partnerships, and careful planning. How can companies overcome the "Valley of Death"? Organizations can overcome the “Valley of Death” by adopting a strategic and proactive approach. Key practices include securing dedicated funding specifically for advanced prototype demonstrations, establishing partnerships with governmental agencies (like NASA or ESA), academic institutions, or industry collaborators that offer testing platforms and expertise, and performing incremental and iterative testing to gradually reduce uncertainties. Robust project management, meticulous planning, and proactive risk mitigation strategies are also essential in navigating this challenging stage of technology maturation successfully. In what ways does TTMS support space projects across different TRL stages? TTMS provides comprehensive support tailored to each TRL stage, covering the entire technology lifecycle. During early phases (TRL 1-3), TTMS assists with foundational research, feasibility studies, and early prototyping through consulting, algorithm development, and software simulations. As technologies mature into intermediate stages (TRL 4-6), TTMS offers technical support through advanced prototype development, rigorous testing, and validation in relevant environments. Finally, for advanced stages (TRL 7-9), TTMS delivers specialized expertise in system integration, thorough verification and validation processes, product assurance (PA), and quality assurance (QA). By providing expertise tailored specifically to the requirements at each TRL, TTMS ensures a smoother progression through critical development phases, enhancing the likelihood of achieving successful operational deployment.
Read
KYC as the Foundation of AML Compliance
KYC as the Foundation of AML Compliance – Role in Preventing Financial Crime and Requirements of 5AMLD/6AMLD KYC (Know Your Customer) is the process of verifying the identity and credibility of clients, which forms the basis of compliance with AML (Anti-Money Laundering) regulations. Thanks to an effective KYC process, financial institutions and other businesses can ensure who they are entering into relationships with, preventing their services from being misused for financial crime such as money laundering or terrorism financing. EU regulations – including the 5th and 6th AML Directives (5AMLD, 6AMLD) – require companies to implement solid KYC procedures as part of their broader AML program. This article explains the importance of the KYC process as the foundation of AML compliance, its role in preventing financial crime, its connection to EU regulations (5AMLD, 6AMLD), and the requirements imposed on companies in the EU. It is aimed at business audiences – banks, financial institutions, real estate firms, law firms, accounting offices, and other obligated entities – who want to understand how to implement an effective KYC process and integrate it with AML solutions. What is the KYC Process and Why Is It Crucial? The KYC process is a set of procedures designed to thoroughly know the customer. It includes identifying and verifying the client’s identity using independent and reliable documents and information, as well as assessing the risks associated with the business relationship. In other words, a company checks who the client is, where their funds come from, and the purpose of the relationship. KYC is essential because it prevents serving anonymous clients or those using false identities and helps detect potentially suspicious circumstances already at the onboarding stage. The KYC process is considered the foundation of AML compliance, as without proper client identification further anti-money laundering activities would be ineffective. Adhering to KYC procedures enables, among other things, establishing the true identity of the customer, learning the source of their funds, and assessing the level of risk, thus forming the first line of defense against the misuse of a company for criminal purposes. Companies that implement effective KYC better protect their reputation and avoid engaging with clients who carry unacceptable risk. Key elements of the KYC process include, among others: Customer Identification (CIP) – collecting the customer’s basic personal data (e.g., name, address, date of birth, national ID or tax number in the case of a company) and copies of identity and registration documents as the first step in establishing the relationship. Identity Verification – confirming the authenticity of collected data using documents (ID card, passport), public registers, or other independent sources. Modern e-KYC tools are often used, such as biometric verification of documents and facial recognition, to quickly and accurately verify the client. Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) – identifying the natural person who ultimately controls a client that is a legal entity. This requires determining the ownership structure and often consulting registers such as the Central Register of Beneficial Owners. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) – analyzing and assessing customer risk based on the information collected. This includes checking whether the client appears on sanctions lists or is a politically exposed person (PEP), as well as understanding the client’s business profile and the purpose and nature of the relationship. Standard CDD applies to most customers with a typical risk profile. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) – in-depth verification for high-risk clients. If a client is deemed high risk (e.g., a foreign politician, operating in a high-risk country, or carrying out very large transactions), the institution must apply enhanced security measures: request additional documentation, monitor transactions more frequently, and obtain senior management approval to establish or maintain the relationship. Ongoing Monitoring – the KYC process does not end once the client has been onboarded. It is crucial to continuously monitor customer activity and transactions to detect potential suspicious actions. This includes regular updates of client information (periodic refresh of KYC data), analyzing transactions for consistency with the customer’s profile, and reacting to red flags (e.g., unusually large cash deposits). All of the above elements make up a comprehensive “Know Your Customer” process, which is the cornerstone of secure business operations. Best practices require documenting all KYC activities and retaining the collected data for the legally mandated period (usually 5 years or more). This allows the institution to demonstrate to regulators that it fulfills its KYC/AML obligations and properly manages customer risk. The Role of KYC in Preventing Financial Crime Strong KYC procedures are essential for preventing financial crime. By thoroughly knowing the customer, companies can identify red flags pointing to potential money laundering, terrorism financing, or fraud at an early stage. For example, verifying the client’s identity and source of funds may reveal that the person appears in suspect registers or originates from a sanctioned country – requiring enhanced scrutiny or refusal of cooperation. KYC provides critical input data to AML systems. Information gathered about the customer (e.g., identification data, PEP status, transaction profile) feeds analytical engines and transaction monitoring systems. This enables automated comparison of the customer’s behavior against their expected risk profile. If the customer begins conducting unusual operations – for example, significantly larger transactions than usual or transfers to high-risk jurisdictions – the AML system will detect anomalies based on KYC data and generate an alert. In this way, KYC and AML work together to prevent illegal financial activities. Good KYC increases the effectiveness of transaction monitoring and makes it easier to identify truly suspicious activities, while at the same time reducing the number of false alerts. In addition, fulfilling KYC obligations deters potential criminals. A financial institution that requires full identification and verification becomes less attractive to those attempting to launder money. From a company’s perspective, effective KYC not only prevents fines and financial losses associated with (even unintentional) involvement in criminal activity, but also protects its reputation. In sectors such as banking or real estate, trust is key – and implementing high KYC standards builds the institution’s credibility in the eyes of both clients and regulators. EU AML Regulations: 5AMLD, 6AMLD and KYC Obligations for Companies The European Union has developed a comprehensive set of AML/KYC regulations designed to harmonize and strengthen the fight against money laundering across all Member States. The main legal acts are successive AML Directives: 4AMLD, 5AMLD and 6AMLD (the fourth, fifth and sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directives). These directives have been transposed into national law (in Poland through the Act of March 1, 2018 on Counteracting Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) and impose on obligated institutions a range of requirements related to KYC and AML. Obligated institutions include all entities operating in sectors particularly exposed to the risk of money laundering. These cover not only banks and investment firms, but also insurers, brokerage houses, payment institutions, and currency exchange offices, as well as non-financial entities – such as notaries, lawyers (when handling clients’ financial transactions), tax advisors, accounting offices, real estate brokers, auction houses and art galleries (selling luxury goods), cryptocurrency exchanges, and lending companies. All of these entities are legally required to apply KYC and AML procedures. They must implement internal policies and procedures that ensure customer identification, risk assessment, transaction registration and reporting, as well as staff training on AML regulations. 5th AML Directive (5AMLD), effective from January 2020, introduced significant extensions to KYC obligations. Among other things, the list of obligated institutions was expanded – for the first time including cryptocurrency exchanges and wallet providers, who are now required to conduct full KYC on their users and report suspicious operations. 5AMLD also emphasized greater transparency of company ownership information by mandating public access to registers of beneficial owners of companies in the EU, making it easier for institutions to access ownership data of corporate clients. Additional security measures were introduced for transactions with high-risk countries, and thresholds for certain transactions requiring KYC were lowered (e.g., for occasional transactions involving virtual currencies, the threshold was set at EUR 1000). For financial institutions and other firms, this meant updating KYC/AML procedures – adapting them to cover new types of clients and transactions, and to use new registers. 6th AML Directive (6AMLD), transposed by Member States by December 2020, focuses on harmonizing definitions of money laundering offenses and tightening sanctions. It introduced a common EU-wide list of 22 predicate offences, the commission of which is considered the source of “dirty money” subject to money laundering. Among these offences, cybercrime was added for the first time in EU AML regulations. 6AMLD required EU countries to introduce laws providing harsher penalties for money laundering – across the Union, the minimum maximum prison sentence for this crime must be at least 4 years. Another important element of 6AMLD is the extension of criminal liability to legal entities (companies). A business can be held liable if, for example, its management allows money laundering to occur within the company’s operations or fails to meet oversight obligations. In practice, 6AMLD forces companies to take even greater care with compliance – lapses in AML controls can result in severe legal consequences not only for employees but also for the organization itself. The EU directives translate into specific KYC/AML requirements for companies. Every obligated institution in the EU must apply so-called customer due diligence measures, which include: identification and verification of the customer and beneficial owner, assessment of the purpose and nature of the business relationship, ongoing monitoring of customer transactions, and retaining collected information for at least 5 years. For high-risk clients, enhanced due diligence (EDD) is required, such as obtaining additional information on the sources of wealth or closer monitoring of transactions. Companies must also maintain a register of transactions above defined thresholds and report suspicious transactions to the competent authorities (e.g., in Poland, to GIIF). In addition, regulations require companies to appoint an AML Officer responsible for oversight and to regularly train staff on current AML rules. Failure to comply with KYC/AML obligations carries serious sanctions. Regulators may impose high administrative fines – up to 5 million euros or 10% of annual company turnover for severe violations. They may also apply other measures such as a temporary ban on conducting certain activities or public disclosure of the violation, exposing the firm to major reputational damage. In addition, individuals (e.g., management board members) may face criminal liability – in Poland, money laundering is punishable by up to 12 years of imprisonment. All this means that adhering to AML regulations and diligently carrying out the KYC process is not just a legal duty, but a matter of business survival and security. Implementing an Effective KYC Process and Integration with AML Solutions To meet legal requirements and genuinely reduce risk, companies must not only formally implement KYC procedures but do so effectively and integrate them with the overall AML system. Below are the key steps and best practices for building an effective KYC process and linking it to broader AML activities: Risk assessment and AML/KYC policy: An organization should begin with a risk assessment of money laundering related to its activities and types of clients. Based on this, it develops an internal AML/KYC policy defining customer identification procedures, division of responsibilities, incident reporting, etc. A risk-based approach ensures resources are directed where risk is highest – e.g., stricter procedures for clients from high-risk countries or sectors. Customer identification and verification procedures: The company should implement standardized procedures for collecting and verifying data from new clients. Increasingly, digital solutions streamline KYC – for example, remote identity verification apps using document scanning and biometric facial verification. It is also important to check clients in available registers and databases, such as EU/UN sanctions lists and PEP databases, which can be automated using specialized software. Identifying beneficial owners in corporate clients: For business or organizational clients, it is essential to determine their ownership structure and identify the natural persons who ultimately control the entity (UBOs). Central registers of beneficial owners (such as CRBR in Poland) can help, but under 5AMLD institutions cannot rely solely on these registers – they should independently verify information and document any difficulties in identifying the owner. Integrating KYC data with transaction systems: All customer information obtained during KYC should be used in ongoing monitoring. Ideally, the company’s banking or financial system should be integrated with an AML module so that the client’s risk profile influences transaction monitoring. For example, a high-risk client will be subject to more frequent and detailed analysis. KYC data feeds AML scoring engines, enabling automatic detection of unusual behavior and faster response. Such integration also reduces data silos and the risk of overlooking important client information. Automation and modern technologies: Implementing dedicated IT solutions can significantly increase effectiveness and reduce the costs of KYC/AML. For example, AI-based systems can analyze customer behavior and transactions in real time, while machine learning helps detect unnatural patterns that may indicate money laundering. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is used to automatically extract and verify data from documents (OCR), reducing human error. Research shows that automation and KYC/AML integration can shorten new customer verification time by up to 80% and drastically cut errors. As a result, compliance improves while customer onboarding becomes faster and less burdensome. Training and compliance audits: Technology alone cannot replace human factors. Staff must be properly trained in KYC/AML procedures and know how to recognize warning signs. Companies should regularly conduct training for frontline employees and management, and also perform periodic internal compliance audits. Audits help identify gaps or irregularities in fulfilling KYC/AML obligations and implement corrective actions before an external regulator’s inspection. In summary, effective implementation of the KYC process requires a combination of people, procedures, and technology. Obligated institutions should treat KYC not as a burden, but as an investment in the security of their business. An integrated KYC/AML process ensures compliance with regulations, early detection of abuse attempts, increased operational efficiency, and trust-building with clients and business partners. In the dynamic EU regulatory environment (with further changes underway, including the establishment of a pan-European AML authority – AMLA), companies must continuously refine their KYC/AML procedures to stay ahead of financial criminals and meet growing supervisory demands. Most Common Questions about KYC/AML (FAQ) What is the KYC process and what is its purpose? The KYC (Know Your Customer) process is a set of procedures aimed at knowing and verifying the customer’s identity. Its purpose is to confirm that the client is who they claim to be and to understand the risks associated with serving them. As part of KYC, the institution collects personal data and documents (e.g., ID card, company registration documents), verifies their authenticity, and assesses the client’s profile (including sources of funds, type of business activity). The goal of KYC is to protect the company from engaging with imposters, dishonest clients, or those involved in money laundering or terrorism financing. In short – thanks to KYC, a company knows who it is dealing with and can consciously manage the associated risks. How is KYC different from AML? KYC and AML are related but distinct concepts. KYC focuses on knowing the customer – it is the process of identifying and verifying client data and assessing risk before and during the business relationship. AML (Anti-Money Laundering), on the other hand, is a broader system of regulations, procedures, and actions aimed at preventing money laundering and terrorist financing across the organization as a whole. In other words, KYC is one element of the overall AML program. In practice, AML includes not only the initial verification of the customer (KYC), but also ongoing transaction monitoring, behavioral analysis, detection of suspicious patterns, and reporting of suspicious transactions to the relevant authorities. KYC provides the input – knowledge of who the customer is and their characteristics – while the AML system uses this data for comprehensive oversight of financial activity after the relationship has begun. Both elements must work closely together: even the best AML transaction monitoring tools will not function effectively if the company knows nothing about its clientele (lack of KYC), and conversely – KYC alone without subsequent monitoring will not be enough to detect unusual transactions conducted by an apparently “normal” client. Which EU regulations govern KYC/AML obligations (5AMLD, 6AMLD)? In the European Union, the legal framework for KYC/AML obligations is set out in successive AML directives. 4AMLD (Directive 2015/849) introduced the risk-based approach and the requirement to create central registers of beneficial owners of companies. 5AMLD (Directive 2018/843) expanded the scope of regulation – bringing crypto exchanges and wallet providers into the AML regime, placing greater emphasis on beneficial ownership identification (including public access to UBO registers), and tightening rules for cooperation with high-risk countries. 6AMLD (Directive 2018/1673) harmonized definitions of money laundering offenses across the EU and strengthened criminal aspects – it identified 22 predicate offenses, introduced stricter minimum penalties (Member States must provide at least 4 years maximum imprisonment for money laundering), and extended criminal liability to legal entities. In practice, this means that companies in the EU must comply with uniform standards for client identification, verifying their status (e.g., whether they are on a sanctions list), and monitoring transactions. National laws (such as Poland’s AML Act) implement these directives by imposing specific obligations on obligated institutions: applying customer due diligence in defined scenarios, reporting suspicious and above-threshold transactions, retaining documentation, appointing an internal AML Officer, etc. Furthermore, EU regulations are continuously evolving – in 2024, the AML package was agreed, which includes the establishment of an EU-wide AML authority (AMLA) and the introduction of a new AML regulation, further unifying the approach to KYC/AML across the Union. Which companies are subject to KYC/AML obligations? KYC and AML obligations apply to so-called obligated institutions, entities designated by law as particularly exposed to the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing. The list is broad. It traditionally includes all financial institutions: banks (including foreign branches), credit unions, brokerage houses, insurance companies (especially life insurers), investment funds, payment institutions, and currency exchange offices. In addition, AML obligations also apply to notaries, lawyers (when handling clients’ financial transactions such as property deals or company formation), tax advisors, auditors, and accounting offices. The catalog of obligated institutions also includes real estate agents, businesses dealing in luxury goods (e.g., antiques, works of art, precious stones – if transactions exceed a set threshold), and, since 5AMLD, crypto exchanges and wallet providers. As a result, the duty to implement KYC/AML procedures rests on a very wide range of companies – not only banks. Each of these institutions must identify their clients, monitor their transactions, and report suspicions to state authorities. It is worth noting that even companies outside the official list of obligated institutions often voluntarily adopt KYC/AML measures (e.g., fintechs not under full supervision), as this is seen as good business practice and a way to build customer trust. How to effectively implement KYC in a company and integrate it with AML? Implementing an effective KYC process requires a multi-layered approach – combining clearly defined procedures, trained personnel, and the right technological tools. Here are a few steps and principles to achieve this goal: 1. Set the framework and risk assessment: Begin by defining an AML/KYC policy tailored to the company’s profile. It should state when KYC measures must be applied (e.g., at the start of every client relationship or for transactions above a certain threshold) and who is responsible. At the same time, conduct a risk assessment to identify business areas and client types most vulnerable to money laundering. The results help focus attention where risk is highest. 2. Apply appropriate identification procedures: Collecting complete information from the client and verifying its authenticity is crucial. Prepare lists of acceptable identity and registration documents and establish verification procedures. Increasingly, remote verification tools (e-KYC) are used, such as automatic reading of ID data and comparing the photo in the document with the client’s live facial image. These technologies speed up the process and reduce human error. 3. Screen clients against external databases: A key part of KYC is checking whether the client appears on international sanctions lists or in PEP databases. Manual searching is inefficient – it is better to use screening systems that automatically compare client data against constantly updated lists. This way, the company immediately knows if a prospective client is sanctioned or holds a prominent public function, requiring additional measures (EDD). 4. Identify beneficial owners: For corporate clients, you must establish who ultimately owns and controls the entity. Obtain current extracts from registers (e.g., national company registers) and use beneficial ownership registers to understand the ownership structure. For complex ownership (e.g., subsidiaries of foreign holdings), request organizational charts or declarations. Record every step – regulations require documenting difficulties in identifying UBOs. 5. Link KYC with transaction monitoring: The data collected during KYC should be used in ongoing monitoring. A client’s risk profile should influence transaction monitoring parameters. Modern AML systems define detection scenarios using KYC data (e.g., different thresholds for low-risk vs. high-risk clients). Ensuring automatic, real-time integration between KYC databases and transaction systems is critical. This integration allows anomalies to be detected more quickly and improves the effectiveness of the entire AML program. 6. Use technology and automation: Investing in RegTech solutions improves efficiency. For example, AML platforms can score risk automatically using KYC data, and AI-based systems can analyze transactions in real time, learning normal behavior patterns and generating alerts for anomalies. Automation reduces manual work like retyping data (OCR handles it) or creating reports. Studies show that RegTech solutions can cut onboarding time by up to 80% and reduce errors and false positives, letting compliance staff focus on truly suspicious cases. 7. Train staff and ensure compliance audits: Even the best procedures will fail if people do not follow them or do not understand their purpose. Regular AML/KYC training is mandatory – both at onboarding new employees and periodically (e.g., annually) for all staff. Training reinforces the ability to spot suspicious activity and respond properly. Management should also ensure independent internal audits of AML/KYC procedures to verify compliance, documentation completeness, and system effectiveness. Audit results enable corrective actions before regulators uncover issues. Implementing an effective KYC process is continuous, not a one-off project. AML regulations evolve, new risks (e.g., from cryptocurrencies or emerging fintech) appear, so companies must continuously adapt. Still, investing in robust KYC/AML processes brings multiple benefits – avoiding fines, protecting reputation, and creating a transparent, secure business environment that supports long-term growth. What are the most common mistakes companies make when implementing KYC? One of the most common mistakes is approaching KYC as a one-off obligation rather than a continuous process. Organizations often fail to update client information, rely too much on manual checks instead of using automation, or overlook the importance of training employees. These shortcomings create compliance risks and reduce the effectiveness of the entire AML framework. How does KYC affect the customer experience? When properly implemented, KYC can actually improve customer experience. Automated e-KYC tools allow customers to go through onboarding faster and with fewer documents, often in a fully digital process. Clear communication and user-friendly design help reduce frustration, while strong verification builds trust and confidence in the institution. Is KYC only relevant for the financial sector? KYC obligations extend far beyond traditional banks and insurers. Real estate agencies, law firms, accounting offices, luxury goods dealers, art galleries, casinos, and cryptocurrency exchanges are also required to conduct KYC under EU directives. Even companies outside the formal list of obligated entities increasingly adopt KYC voluntarily to safeguard their reputation and business relationships. How is automation changing the KYC process? Automation has become a game changer for KYC. Artificial intelligence, RegTech, and robotic process automation allow firms to handle large volumes of customer data more efficiently. Automated sanctions screening, biometric ID verification, and real-time monitoring reduce errors and free up compliance teams to focus on genuinely suspicious cases. What does the future of KYC look like beyond 2025? KYC is expected to integrate with digital identity initiatives across the EU, making verification faster and more secure. Technologies such as blockchain analytics, biometric authentication, and cross-border data sharing will become standard. With the creation of the EU AML Authority (AMLA), supervision will become more centralized and harmonized, ensuring higher consistency and stricter enforcement across Member States.
Read